9/11 Scholars Forum

Exposing Falsehoods and Revealing Truths

Dead Men Talking


Dead Men Talking

We collect the most relevant evidence of government participation in the events of 9/11. Bring evidence here and discuss its truth and relevance!

Website: http://www.deanhartwell.com
Members: 7
Latest Activity: Jun 14, 2010

Read Dead Men Talking

This is the book that presents my case about 9/11

I would like to hear your thoughts.

The point of the book is to identify the best evidence of government conspiracy. I mention the Standard Operating Procedures of air defense and how they were not followed; I mention "blips" appearing on the screens of FAA employees and who had the authority and the power to put them there to confuse them; I mention warnings given to Bush Administration officials that were not followed. And a lot more.

I avoided the more controversial evidence such as what happened at the Pentagon. I feared that my thoughts on this subject and others like it would distract from the proof beyond a reasonable doubt that government agents acted on 9/11 to commit murder. If you tell a skeptic several ideas, it is a cinch they will attack the ideas with the least factual support and ignore the rest of what you say.

If you have thoughts about what hit the WTC 1 and 2 and the Pentagon and about cell phones, etc. please tell me.

Discussion Forum

Future Petitions to Ask People to Support New Investigation on 9/11

This group will collect the most relevant facts on the culprits of 9/11 to make it easy to put together new petitions and fact sheets.  It will also serve as the basis for essays which are especially…Continue

Tags: article, essay, investigation, facts, petition

Started by Dean Apr 11, 2010.

Comment Wall


You need to be a member of Dead Men Talking to add comments!

Comment by Whathappened Tothewtc on April 13, 2010 at 3:47pm
Have you ever considered the possibility that the US government was NOT behind the plot?

My theory says it was a small group of people who operated the machines by computer.

A small group of people did this. Maybe some of them were from the US government, but maybe not.

Kind regards,
Comment by Whathappened Tothewtc on April 13, 2010 at 2:47pm
Hi Dean and Sandy,

In my opinion, nothing at all hit WTC 2. A projected image glided
into the building, but that isn't an impact.

Any and every impact would show pieces bouncing off the building at the impact site.

Kind regards,
Comment by sandy rose on April 13, 2010 at 10:05am
um, let us see..... the picture of the first hit on wtc
if i be not mistaken comes from the (VERY SUSPICIOUS)
naudet documentary film 9/11, which in my opinion is a
must see for all truthers, tho i realize not all truthers have
bothered to must see it.
i believe the naudet doc was shown maybe half a year(?)
after the actual 9/11 and five years later? but don't quote me
on that! i understand that the always 'helpful' FIB took the
footage from the very guilty naudet bros before airing it on
teeeee veeeeee. which in my head proves that they wanted
us to see what we saw...... then, the person in my opinion
who has done the utmost greatest most priceless work on
this 9/11 stuff, Rosalee Grable, (standing ovation appropriate),
did great work on breaking down this video and posting it on
her fabulous web site the Web Fairy, 9/11 part in particular.
Webby, if you're listening, please feel free to add your input...

Dean, if you haven't yet seen the naudet doc, please do!
i am not an expert on video or science, etc., i sew for a
'living', but i am 100+% convinced that the noday doc was made
on purpose as a keepsake for the horrid swine that pulled 9/11,
and that it also holds great value for the 9/11 truth enthusiast.
(please also search for a fascinating report by i believe it
was Leslie Raphael, or close to that, who did a great study
on how/why the naudet shot didn't just happen by accident)
so who took it i think would be none other than jules (or
i prefer to call him jewels) naudet, on 9/11 morn, when the whole
street just HAPPENED to be nice and clear for the event......
or so the story went, i think. doesn't mean it was actually
jewels, since we don't know that for sure.....
and yowwww, absotutely, the object was something
other than what our perps said it was, i have no doubt.
and yeah, the x43A scramjet that i mentioned, and
have over at photo gallery is not something that most
merrikkkins would know of, since 'they' don't exactly
broadcast that sort of thing. why so secret, you might ask?
years back it occurred to me to go look for pics of
the first hit on wtc, since we saw the supposed 2nd hit
over and over and over and over....... when i went looking
for that first hit i found Ms. Web Fairy herself, and her
AWESOME work, and i said to myself, "WHOA".
then after checking out her site, especially the part
where she shows the old drone that looked like a pointy
nosed bumble bee or something, i went looking for
'drones', wondering if i would see one that looked like the
one on noday doc first wtc hit pictures. lo and behold i
came across naasuh's photo gallery and for the first time
in my life, saw a pic of an x43A scramjet....scrammy, i like
to call him, for short. my jaw fell rapidly to the floor, and
i know others have other opinions about what did or did not
hit wtcs, but since then i am stuck on scrammy. nobody
that i know of shares my conviction about scrammy but
that does not shake my opinion. not one bit.
so, thank you for your interest in this, this is a great
place to have that interest, we are not mocked for our
thoughts here, and that does not come around often.

thanks for what you do and i will shut up for the now!
Comment by Dean on April 12, 2010 at 1:53pm
Thank you, Sandy! The WTC Towers are a good place to start. The best evidence will be both true and relevant to the issue of whether government agents acted.

The truth may never be completely known, but the proof of truth can be achieved with authenticity, reliability and accuracy.

We need to ascertain the authenticity of the photograph. Who took it?
We need reliability (ex: the phototaker or publisher had no bias in making the picture public)
We need accuracy - is the object in the picture something other than what our government said it was?
We need relevancy - if the object is not one of the flights 11 or 175, the relevancy becomes high. Who else but someone in the govt could conceal a plane like the one you mentioned?

This is a picture that contains evidence. If we can answer the questions, we can determine whether it is proof of wrongdoing by government agents. What answers do you have?

Comment by sandy rose on April 12, 2010 at 10:04am
hi Dean, glad to see you start this group. since you asked
about peoples' thoughts about what hit the wtc towers, for years
i have thought that x43A scramjets were involved, or maybe one
(or two) of their larger cousins. see my picture over at photos.
see how similar it looks to object in Web Fairy flash frame shot.
also in my photos.
i look forward to hearing more!

Members (6)


© 2022   Created by James H. Fetzer.   Powered by

Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service