"the *ten year anniversary"
Exposing Falsehoods and Revealing Truths
-
Whathappened Tothewtc
- Female
- New York, NY
- United States
- Blog Posts
- Discussions (1)
- Photos (1)
- Photo Albums
- Videos
Whathappened Tothewtc's Discussions
Metallic Foam
1 Reply
Started this discussion. Last reply by Shallel Octavia Feb 11, 2011.
Gifts Received
Whathappened Tothewtc has not received any gifts yet
Whathappened Tothewtc's Page
Latest Activity
Whathappened Tothewtc posted a status"http://wtcdust.blogspot.com This is a paper (in 11 parts) that I wrote on the then year anniversary."
Shallel Octavia replied to Whathappened Tothewtc's discussion Metallic Foam"Most interesting, WHTWTC! The destructive weapon must have Lather, Foam, Rinse and Repeat settings.
I am looking at Krups as a possible perp, as I view the similarities to the destruction in my frothy good Mocha Latte.
Cheers, and please post…"
Whathappened Tothewtc posted a discussionMetallic Foam
My results show that the World Trade Center was turned into a metallic foam. WTC%20Foam%20remained%20until%20after%20WTC%207%20was%20rebuilt.JPG See the stripes and swirls? That is what all the fire fighters were calling "rivers of molten steel." They almost got it right. What was seen in the…See More
Whathappened Tothewtc commented on Jack D. White's photo
15building6cnncol
"Actually, no. The buildings could have been dissolved by an energy weapon and result in the damage seen. You don't need a bomb."
Whathappened Tothewtc commented on Ozzy bin Oswald's photo
Nice Clear Smoke Cloning in WTC Collapse Image
"Regularity in the smoke patterns might indicate a whole lotta TV video fakery, but it could also be that the smoke was shooting out in regular patterns due to physical causes."
Whathappened Tothewtc commented on Whathappened Tothewtc's photo
Projected Image of a Shadow
"OK. Here are the technical details. I make the claim that a projected image of an airplane is what was seen traveling through the sky and into WTC 2. The problem with this claim is that most people think that it is impossible. I don't know why…"
Projected Image of a Shadow
"i'm trying to, feel free to explain more in depth, i am totally
interested in hearing more... how it relates to 9/11 'photos'..
but man, that picture came out cool! i wouldn't mind
having a poster of that pic, tho i know you…"
Whathappened Tothewtc's Photos
Comment Wall (12 comments)
- At 5:52am on July 16, 2009, Whathappened Tothewtc said…
- thanks, thoth, but it wasn't nukes, either
nuclear bombs (or at least every nuclear bomb I've ever heard about)
generates a lot of heat
the dust cloud that rolled over the people didn't burn the people
therefore nuclear bombs did not cause the dust cloud
because it wasn't hot
- At 1:25pm on July 15, 2009,
Thoth II said… - WhathappenedTWC said: " thermite melts steel
thermite doesn't turn a building into dust
let's say somebody trucked in a whole bunch of
thermite (or sprayed it on) and then set it off
the result? molten steel would fall to the ground
fine powdered dust wouldn't shoot upwards into the air"
I agree with you here. I really don't get why Steve Jones fixated so doggedly on thermite from day one and still won't hear of any other possibilities. I do think thermite would more melt than turn WTC into dust. Also, the practical problem: it would take so very much thermite to demolish these towers in seconds. I just can't see how they would get it into every nook and cranny to do this.
But other things like nuclear devices wouldn't be limited like this. Those you could plant just maybe a dozen of near the core columns and it would produce effects like we see.
- At 7:32pm on July 14, 2009, Whathappened Tothewtc said…
- i don't want unity with the Stephen Jonesers
they are evil liars
- At 7:13pm on July 13, 2009, Whathappened Tothewtc said…
- of course i'm real
my views on 9/11:
no planes were hijacked
no planes crashed into buildings
videos of the day do not depict plane crashes
the planes in the video just melted into the buildings
they didn't bounce off the buildings
so something about the videos is obviously fake
Stephen E. Jones is the most feted of all 9/11 researchers,
but he is a damn smiling liar
i don't care if he has a friendly demeanor
his thermite theory is a fake trail
thermite doesn't explode, it burns
thermite isn't an explosive, it's an incendiary
don't tell me about nano-spray-on-thermite unless
you've got a youtube video showing that it turns
a building into dust
thermite melts steel
thermite doesn't turn a building into dust
let's say somebody trucked in a whole bunch of
thermite (or sprayed it on) and then set it off
the result? molten steel would fall to the ground
fine powdered dust wouldn't shoot upwards into the air
the WTC DID NOT COLLAPSE
the WTC buildings exploded
they exploded into very fine dust,
much of which shot directly up into the sky
that idiot Jones is talking about how he scraped
the Hudson River and found thermitic material
HEY JONES ---> were you able to sample the
stuff that went directly up into the air and never
came to the ground?
what happened to the wtc was an unusual process
we don't have the words in our common vocabulary
yet to express what this process was
before Hiroshima, very few people knew about atomic
bombs or would have had the proper vocabulary to
describe one should they have witnessed one going off
Judy Wood was right about his and a multitude of other things
what happened at the wtc was the new hiroshima
a new weapon using a new technology
the most hopeful thing i can take out of the many years of
sadness and destruction that has come because of 9/11
is that after we uncover the criminals
we can use their technology
it's big
the real weapon is the real search
- At 6:46pm on July 13, 2009, Whathappened Tothewtc said…
- did you read the thread? for jim to tell me i could stay anonymous if i were judy wood is a contradiction
if i'm ever rude to someone or post lies, that's a reason not to like me
otherwise say hi to Killtown and others
- At 4:53am on July 8, 2009, Whathappened Tothewtc said…
- thoth: right on
julie: you're mostly talking about who did it, the "who" and the "why"
On a certain level, i don't really care who did it. When we find out what really happened, we will know who did it.
- At 4:50pm on July 6, 2009, Thoth II said…
- What did not happen at WTC: 1. no Boeing passenger jets flew into either tower because no parts were found 2. gravity did not "collapse" the towers.
3. the videos cannot be showing real planes hitting the south tower because they violate Newton's laws. The possibility of fake videos , compositing, or something technical like that; or maybe a hologram, exists.
What did happen at WTC: 1. the towers were turned to fine dust in a matter of seconds
So the researchers are trying to explain above with the exact techniques that were used.
- At 4:00pm on July 6, 2009, Whathappened Tothewtc said…
- ok, but i'm not judy wood
i used the icon because too many people get into WHO did it when we don't know WHAT happened
- At 3:40pm on July 6, 2009,
James H. Fetzer said… - OK. You are welcome. Make some posts. Glad to have you here. Jim
- At 5:46pm on July 5, 2009, James H. Fetzer said…
- Yes, I agree across the board. If Whathappened is Judy or someone else with a good reason, I will not insist that she further identify herself. But I personally need to know who is here. If you want to suggest some possibilities or extend them an invitation yourself, please do that, Jack. I am very glad you are here.
About
© 2013 Created by James H. Fetzer.
Powered by
