9/11 Scholars Forum

Exposing Falsehoods and Revealing Truths

Whathappened Tothewtc
  • Female
  • New York, NY
  • United States

Whathappened Tothewtc's Friends

  • Abrahm
  • Dean
  • sandy rose

Whathappened Tothewtc's Groups

Whathappened Tothewtc's Discussions

Metallic Foam
1 Reply

Started this discussion. Last reply by Shallel Octavia Feb 11, 2011.

Gifts Received

Gift

Whathappened Tothewtc has not received any gifts yet

Give a Gift

 

Whathappened Tothewtc's Page

Latest Activity

Whathappened Tothewtc posted a status
"the *ten year anniversary"
Oct 5, 2011
Whathappened Tothewtc posted a status
"http://wtcdust.blogspot.com This is a paper (in 11 parts) that I wrote on the then year anniversary."
Oct 5, 2011
Shallel Octavia replied to Whathappened Tothewtc's discussion Metallic Foam
"Most interesting, WHTWTC! The destructive weapon must have Lather, Foam, Rinse and Repeat settings. I am looking at Krups as a possible perp, as I view the similarities to the destruction in my frothy good Mocha Latte.   Cheers, and please post…"
Feb 11, 2011
Whathappened Tothewtc posted a discussion

Metallic Foam

My results show that the World Trade Center was turned into a metallic foam. WTC%20Foam%20remained%20until%20after%20WTC%207%20was%20rebuilt.JPG See the stripes and swirls? That is what all the fire fighters were calling "rivers of molten steel." They almost got it right. What was seen in the…See More
Feb 9, 2011
Whathappened Tothewtc commented on Dean's group Dead Men Talking
"Dean, I like it. It's simple. I question #2, though. You presume that either the videos were faked (hard to do) or that something else hit the towers. Also, Fetzer's comment presumes a plane (that it flew impossibly fast). What I'm…"
Jun 7, 2010
Whathappened Tothewtc commented on Dean's group Dead Men Talking
"Lovely essay, especially the "hot" and "cold" part of the parent's gift."
May 22, 2010
Whathappened Tothewtc commented on Dean's group Dead Men Talking
"Excellent find, Sharon!"
May 18, 2010
Whathappened Tothewtc commented on Dean's group Dead Men Talking
"The errors in Simon Shack's work are serious. TV Fakery doesn't make sense, and (with much effort) I have not been able to convince myself that TV Fakery was a part of the 9:03AM "second hit" videos. I don't think it…"
May 18, 2010
Whathappened Tothewtc commented on Dean's group Dead Men Talking
"What if they released all the footage, and it showed exactly what it already shows, only in higher resolution. Then what? Is it time to dump TV Fakery after that?"
May 15, 2010
Whathappened Tothewtc commented on Dean's group Dead Men Talking
"The evidence that isn't there: a plane. They didn't rebuild the plane and show us how it happened. They expected us to believe that planes "vaporize" after crashing, which they don't. The dog that didn't bark. There was…"
May 8, 2010
Whathappened Tothewtc commented on Dean's group Dead Men Talking
"Agreed on both points."
May 3, 2010
Whathappened Tothewtc commented on Dean's group Dead Men Talking
"Much of the hearsay evidence contradicts the electrical weapon theory. There are news stories about hijackers and internet stories about LIHOP, MIHOP, pods and thermite. All of these stories contradict the electrical weapon theory. Does any of the…"
May 3, 2010
Whathappened Tothewtc commented on Dean's group Dead Men Talking
"http://howitwasdone911.blogspot.com/2010/04/to-understand-911-you-must-go-back-and.html Outline: 1. Introduction - Why we need to know some stuff first before we can understand 9/11. 2. Nature of matter - How the World Trade Center (WTC) was…"
Apr 25, 2010
Whathappened Tothewtc commented on Dean's group Dead Men Talking
"How does your comment particularly apply to the conversation?"
Apr 24, 2010
Whathappened Tothewtc commented on Dean's group Dead Men Talking
"Thanks, Sandy. I must have viewed the North Tower explosion and dustification a thousand times by now. I have something to add, since you all seem very receptive. Watch the explosion again, and watch how slowly and even gently the building…"
Apr 24, 2010
Whathappened Tothewtc commented on Dean's group Dead Men Talking
"The original reports are somehow more valid than the 9/11 Commission Report? No, not one bit, except for what we can glean about the historical record of what they were thinking. Why not? Because it was advanced technology, the witnesses and…"
Apr 23, 2010

Whathappened Tothewtc's Photos

Loading…

Comment Wall (12 comments)

You need to be a member of 9/11 Scholars Forum to add comments!

Join 9/11 Scholars Forum

At 5:52am on July 16, 2009, Whathappened Tothewtc said…
thanks, thoth, but it wasn't nukes, either
nuclear bombs (or at least every nuclear bomb I've ever heard about)
generates a lot of heat

the dust cloud that rolled over the people didn't burn the people
therefore nuclear bombs did not cause the dust cloud
because it wasn't hot
At 1:25pm on July 15, 2009, Thoth II said…
WhathappenedTWC said: " thermite melts steel
thermite doesn't turn a building into dust
let's say somebody trucked in a whole bunch of
thermite (or sprayed it on) and then set it off
the result? molten steel would fall to the ground
fine powdered dust wouldn't shoot upwards into the air"

I agree with you here. I really don't get why Steve Jones fixated so doggedly on thermite from day one and still won't hear of any other possibilities. I do think thermite would more melt than turn WTC into dust. Also, the practical problem: it would take so very much thermite to demolish these towers in seconds. I just can't see how they would get it into every nook and cranny to do this.

But other things like nuclear devices wouldn't be limited like this. Those you could plant just maybe a dozen of near the core columns and it would produce effects like we see.
At 7:32pm on July 14, 2009, Whathappened Tothewtc said…
i don't want unity with the Stephen Jonesers
they are evil liars
At 7:13pm on July 13, 2009, Whathappened Tothewtc said…
of course i'm real

my views on 9/11:

no planes were hijacked
no planes crashed into buildings
videos of the day do not depict plane crashes
the planes in the video just melted into the buildings
they didn't bounce off the buildings
so something about the videos is obviously fake

Stephen E. Jones is the most feted of all 9/11 researchers,
but he is a damn smiling liar
i don't care if he has a friendly demeanor
his thermite theory is a fake trail

thermite doesn't explode, it burns
thermite isn't an explosive, it's an incendiary
don't tell me about nano-spray-on-thermite unless
you've got a youtube video showing that it turns
a building into dust

thermite melts steel
thermite doesn't turn a building into dust
let's say somebody trucked in a whole bunch of
thermite (or sprayed it on) and then set it off
the result? molten steel would fall to the ground
fine powdered dust wouldn't shoot upwards into the air

the WTC DID NOT COLLAPSE
the WTC buildings exploded
they exploded into very fine dust,
much of which shot directly up into the sky

that idiot Jones is talking about how he scraped
the Hudson River and found thermitic material
HEY JONES ---> were you able to sample the
stuff that went directly up into the air and never
came to the ground?

what happened to the wtc was an unusual process
we don't have the words in our common vocabulary
yet to express what this process was

before Hiroshima, very few people knew about atomic
bombs or would have had the proper vocabulary to
describe one should they have witnessed one going off

Judy Wood was right about his and a multitude of other things
what happened at the wtc was the new hiroshima
a new weapon using a new technology

the most hopeful thing i can take out of the many years of
sadness and destruction that has come because of 9/11
is that after we uncover the criminals
we can use their technology

it's big

the real weapon is the real search
At 6:46pm on July 13, 2009, Whathappened Tothewtc said…
did you read the thread? for jim to tell me i could stay anonymous if i were judy wood is a contradiction

if i'm ever rude to someone or post lies, that's a reason not to like me

otherwise say hi to Killtown and others
At 4:53am on July 8, 2009, Whathappened Tothewtc said…
thoth: right on
julie: you're mostly talking about who did it, the "who" and the "why"

On a certain level, i don't really care who did it. When we find out what really happened, we will know who did it.
At 4:50pm on July 6, 2009, Thoth II said…
What did not happen at WTC: 1. no Boeing passenger jets flew into either tower because no parts were found 2. gravity did not "collapse" the towers.
3. the videos cannot be showing real planes hitting the south tower because they violate Newton's laws. The possibility of fake videos , compositing, or something technical like that; or maybe a hologram, exists.

What did happen at WTC: 1. the towers were turned to fine dust in a matter of seconds

So the researchers are trying to explain above with the exact techniques that were used.
At 4:00pm on July 6, 2009, Whathappened Tothewtc said…
ok, but i'm not judy wood
i used the icon because too many people get into WHO did it when we don't know WHAT happened
At 3:40pm on July 6, 2009, James H. Fetzer said…
OK. You are welcome. Make some posts. Glad to have you here. Jim
At 5:46pm on July 5, 2009, James H. Fetzer said…
Yes, I agree across the board. If Whathappened is Judy or someone else with a good reason, I will not insist that she further identify herself. But I personally need to know who is here. If you want to suggest some possibilities or extend them an invitation yourself, please do that, Jack. I am very glad you are here.
 
 
 

© 2017   Created by James H. Fetzer.   Powered by

Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service