9/11 Scholars Forum

Exposing Falsehoods and Revealing Truths

Dead Men Talking

Information

Dead Men Talking

We collect the most relevant evidence of government participation in the events of 9/11. Bring evidence here and discuss its truth and relevance!

Website: http://www.deanhartwell.com
Members: 7
Latest Activity: Jun 14, 2010

Read Dead Men Talking

This is the book that presents my case about 9/11

I would like to hear your thoughts.

The point of the book is to identify the best evidence of government conspiracy. I mention the Standard Operating Procedures of air defense and how they were not followed; I mention "blips" appearing on the screens of FAA employees and who had the authority and the power to put them there to confuse them; I mention warnings given to Bush Administration officials that were not followed. And a lot more.

I avoided the more controversial evidence such as what happened at the Pentagon. I feared that my thoughts on this subject and others like it would distract from the proof beyond a reasonable doubt that government agents acted on 9/11 to commit murder. If you tell a skeptic several ideas, it is a cinch they will attack the ideas with the least factual support and ignore the rest of what you say.

If you have thoughts about what hit the WTC 1 and 2 and the Pentagon and about cell phones, etc. please tell me.

Discussion Forum

Future Petitions to Ask People to Support New Investigation on 9/11

This group will collect the most relevant facts on the culprits of 9/11 to make it easy to put together new petitions and fact sheets.  It will also serve as the basis for essays which are especially…Continue

Tags: article, essay, investigation, facts, petition

Started by Dean Apr 11, 2010.

Comment Wall

Comment

You need to be a member of Dead Men Talking to add comments!

Comment by Dean on May 21, 2010 at 11:39pm
I have written a new article in which I articulate the logic of considering the "no plane" concept. Comments are welcome as this group is a work in progress shared by all of us!
http://deanhartwell.weebly.com/1/post/2010/05/to-solve-the-crime-of...
Comment by Sharon Smith on May 19, 2010 at 2:17pm
sorry Sandy, I thought this was the same as fakery. TV fakery must not be the same. we really need a real investigation of 9/11.
I know that nothing I saw that day happened the way they told us. 9 years researching and still searching for the truth. Where was the noise of the plane engines sliding across the concrete floor. should have been heard like nails on a chaukboard. no planes.
Comment by sandy rose on May 19, 2010 at 12:27pm
ok What Happened, every one is shirley entitled to their own own
opinions.
i haint no expert yet i feel sure by this time that no pics of 2nd hit
planes were real, butt fake, ......wait.....i think that first hit on
wtc was real tho blurred. oh gosh, it's all so frreakin complicated..


i am not gonna bitch out anyone who has their own speckalation.
without that, i think we would be at square one, or at the most, two.
we hafta specalate.
Dean, the more we can maybe find out about any such possible
flights would shed only good light on our quest. unless it was bogus.
i say no thing that the swine said about 9/11 was true. l
Comment by Whathappened Tothewtc on May 18, 2010 at 1:12pm
Excellent find, Sharon!
Comment by Sharon Smith on May 18, 2010 at 12:10pm
Could this be projected from a satellite?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S69yA7si0hg

we have the technology
Comment by Whathappened Tothewtc on May 18, 2010 at 12:48am
The errors in Simon Shack's work are serious. TV Fakery doesn't make sense, and (with much effort) I have not been able to convince myself that TV Fakery was a part of the 9:03AM "second hit" videos. I don't think it happened, Sandy.
Comment by Dean on May 17, 2010 at 8:05pm
Following up on my last message, here is my new article which explains how we can best get information from our government on 9/11:

http://deanhartwell.weebly.com/1/post/2010/05/public-liaison-would-...
Comment by Dean on May 17, 2010 at 7:30pm
Does this group think any changes need to be made to my draft flyer? Here it is again: http://deanhartwell.weebly.com/1/post/2010/05/help-wanted-find-proo...

My point with the flyer is to get attention and not get bogged down with too much detail just yet. If you have specific changes, let me know. Otherwise I will forward it to other groups.
Comment by sandy rose on May 17, 2010 at 2:01pm
hi what happened, if the pigs released footage that showed
the same dum stuff we already have, then it would just
reinforce fakey wakey.video experts would need to be consulted,
but we have multiples in our midst. it would be same old same old.
fake same old.
and may i say that i have an inkling that some, maybe many
might be interested in what one of the ONLY no planer sporting groups
known to man or woman kind (let us know if there are others, please)
have to say. thus maybe the umpteen unknown fake looking entities...


translation: i think they're checking out this group since we're one
of real not many!
Comment by sandy rose on May 17, 2010 at 1:46pm
oh yeh and Dean, if "someone" represented the gummint under
oaf, yeah, we should have a say in who that someone was. cause
yeah, if it was like donny rumsmell or the like, fire it up, Shallel!
perhaps it could also be a whole lot of someones NOT representing
the same swine that we think (know) did the very unthinkable. just saying.
 

Members (6)

 
 
 

© 2020   Created by James H. Fetzer.   Powered by

Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service