9/11 Scholars Forum

Exposing Falsehoods and Revealing Truths

Answering Judy Wood's "Must Answer" Questions & Statements on DEWs & Huchison Field Effects (This work is in progress & may be completed by mid April or later.) by Chuck Boldwyn

Answering Judy Wood's "Must Answer" Questions & Statements on DEWs & Huchison Field Effects (This work is in progress & may be completed by mid April or later.) by Chuck Boldwyn

Answers to Question & Statements proposed by Dr. Judy Wood to prove her DEWs and Hurricane Erin destruction of the WTC complex and its environs with Huchison DEW Field Effects. (This work is in progress & may be completed by mid April or later.) by Chuck Boldwyn

  • photo
  • photo
  • photo
  • photo
  • photo
  • photo
  • photo
  • photo
  • photo
  • photo
  • photo
  • photo
  • photo
  • photo
  • photo
  • photo

Comment

You need to be a member of 9/11 Scholars Forum to add comments!

Join 9/11 Scholars Forum

Comment by Thoth II on February 14, 2012 at 11:12am

My initial impression of Chuck's work is below and his poster board 100 long should be viewed by people in detail.  Time and debate have only solidified my confidence in his work.

His is the only hard scientific H explaining the details left and I say it wins by default.  Until other horses show up with this type of hard scientific detail.  

An additional calc. to below is if you multiply the mass of concrete per tower by fracture energy of concrete per kilogram, you arrive at a total fracture energy of 3 X 10(10 power) Joules and divide by about 10 seconds to get 3000 megawatts required power.  The total inability of DEW proponents to give a scientific valid explanation for this amount of power coupled with their lack of a mechanical mechanism for pulverizing the concrete with EM radiation, and details of the chemistry such as rusting ; The DEW H has since then evaporated into thin air.

Comment by Thoth II on April 5, 2011 at 4:27pm

This is a good powerpoint, starting point explanation of data.  I always suspected that mini nukes supplied most of the 6700 Joules/kg (Frank Greening's paper) , required to pulverize the concrete into 60 micron sized dust, but that within the details of the demolition sequence they needed thermite to cut beams initially so they could easily be ejected out of the ground zeros of each mini nuke more easily.  Your initial work here on nanothermite pretty much convinces me that the oxidation effects in the data are best explained by this nanothermite hypothesis.  But I still think that the "heavy lifting/pulverization" was done by mini nukes and I see this is still a work in progress.  

 

Fracture energy/ kg = 6700 J.

Let's compare that with the gravitational potential energy that would be released in an alleged pancake, floor by floor collapse in the twin tower, assuming 3.7 m between floor centers (according to Greening):

Gravitational Potential Energy / kg = gh = 9.8 m/s2 X 3.7 m = 36 J

Now let's compute the ratio of fracture energy / potential energy

RATIO FRACTURE ENERGY/ POTENTIAL ENERGY : 6700 J / 36 J = 186


These guys had forever to plan this, so obviously they did whatever combination of demolition techniques they needed to engineering the whole job.  

© 2022   Created by James H. Fetzer.   Powered by

Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service