Molten Steel/Iron Observed & Replorted Found in Twin Tower lowest Basement levels for 3+ months until all destroyed Tower Materials removed by Control Demolitions, Inc., the same crew that were contr

Please review this previously posted graphic and comment as if you can see the feasability of this theory or not and why you agree or disagree.
Only long acting thermitic-laden dust can explaing the molten metal in the Tower's basements for over 3 months, until the material, all of it, was removed by Controlled Demolitins, Inc.

Originally, I thought all of the fried cars and molten metal in the basements was caused by the energy related to the mini nukes, but changed my mind when I found out about the thermite discovered in all of the dust samples analyzed by Neils Harrit's University of Copenhagen's Chemistry Lab.

Reread the Thermite paper for true comprehension and you will see how my theory makes scientific sense.

Was there unreacted nuclear material that could produce the required heat and do it for 3+ months.
I have seen no credible evidence to date that can explain with mathematical physics and other support for the nuclear material being able to do this.
There are many people who can not or will not allow the thermite evidence to be accepted as a possibility.
I, myself have no problem about accepting thermite as being used to cut core columns and the using mini nuke to finish the job of demolishing the towers.

I am a retired Chemist & Physicist, & to some extent, an Engineer, & to some extent, a Mathematician, so I have no problem in accepting the research, data, and conclusions of the Neils Harritt Thermite paper.

http://www.bentham.org/open/tocpj/articles/V002/7TOCPJ.pdf

Read this paper again

http://www.bentham.org/open/tocpj/articles/V002/7TOCPJ.pdf

and see if you can agree with me that Thermite was a part of the destruction of the Towers.
No one has been remotely able to convince me that Thermite was not used to destroy the Towers.
I do not accept the "nuclear theory" of Dimitri Khalizov, that at least a 150 KiloTon bomb pulverized the whole of the Towers into iron dust and he also claims that no Thermite and no mininukes, and no explosives of any kind other the big nuke were used to pulverize the Towers.
The only way his idea may posibly work would be if they were used after the dust obscure our visions of the mini nuclear blasting that were most visible and the floors were taken out in systematic succession downwards. After visibility was lost, mabe his big nuke took place, but I doubt it.
It is easy to punch hole into Khalizov's 150+ kiloTon nuclear bomb theory.

Please feel free to comment on this Power Point Poster and to comment on Khalizov's single big, big nuke theory...