Proposed Nuclear Destruction of the 3 WTC Towers by Russian Nuclear Expert, Dimitri Khalizov

Comment

Comment by Chuck Boldwyn on December 5, 2010 at 12:49pm

My bad,
Try:
m1v1 + m2v2 = m1v1' + m2v2'

1 is the plane
2 is the Tower or part of the Tower attached to the whole tower.

Comment by Chuck Boldwyn on December 5, 2010 at 12:45pm

This is not posted as disinformation. It is just posted as someone's informational view(s). I am interested in seeing and reviewing and evaluating everyone's views. No one said Khalizov's view was correct.
Your view of F = ma is certainly not correct of the plane allegedly penetrating the Tower's.
The plane is not accelerating. It is going at constant velocity. There are 2 masses involved here, not just the plane. It should be primarily an inelastic collision.
The plane is hitting a wall that is more than 50% steel and also going up against about 6 to 8 acres of about 8 inches of concrete and those being held in place by 500,000 tons of Tower. Penetration, as proposed by the editing media is ludicrous.
Evidently you are easily fooled.
Try m1v1 = m2v2 = m1v1' = m2v2'
Determine the masses and velocities, initial
Determine if the collision is elastic or inelastic
Determine the materials hardnesses
Determine the materials relative strengths per gram of Kg
Determine the materials rebound properties

That should get you started on a more correct physics calculation of the planes estimated final velocity upon collision.

Let me know what you come up with.

F = ma is not applicable here.
p = mv = momentum is applicable for both masses and velocities and the applicable conditions and properties of the materials involved.

I think you need someone to argue with.
Before you start arguments, reinforce your science knowledge and get those tutorial books on Physics and Chemistry that I reccommended before.
I also think you enjoy making a fool of yourself.

Comment by Mehmet Inan on December 5, 2010 at 5:37am

Toitally disinfo picture. It's totally NOT consistent with available evidence.