Create a Ning Network!
9/11 Scholars Forum
Exposing Falsehoods and Revealing Truths
Join 9/11 Scholars Forum
15-20-: I'm afraid Judy-Morgan are going to take the high ground on those because they've claimed ownership of those terms. But those words mean NOTHING in a scientific context. If they claim ownership of those words, they'll of course say they are only possible by something mysterious like a DEW. But there are no fuzzballs, just an ongoing chemical reaction. Yes, dirt was pile on , but that could be to contain fallout radiation or absorb unreacted chemicals. There is no molecular dissociation and transmutation, only chemical reactions, I thought everyone knew rust is a result of a chemical reaction, not nuclear transmutation. They don't even know their basic science.
#22: I myself think most of the explosive energy was eaten up in fracturing the concrete and none left to increase the internal energy (temperature), so most of the event we witnessed was fracturing of concrete mainly and not production of high temperature clouds.
#24 is no mystery at all, of course paper was thrown all over the place, it's so light weight it would get dispersed easily.
#27 they say the cars were toasted, but I see a lot of evidence of exploding engine blocks and those were probably being acted on by thermate
I just think they are biasing the argument by making everything appear MYSTERIOUS when actually it is just plain old brute force chemistry and physics going on, so of course they make people think there is some mysterious explanation.
Welcome to9/11 Scholars Forum
Sign Upor Sign In
© 2019 Created by James H. Fetzer.
Report an Issue |
Terms of Service
Please check your browser settings or contact your system administrator.