9/11 Scholars Forum

Exposing Falsehoods and Revealing Truths

'9/11 panel was warned not to probe too deeply'

'9/11 panel was warned not to probe too deeply' --Leaked confidential documents have revealed that senior officials from the former US administration had warned a 9/11 investigation panel against probing too deeply into the terrorist attacks. 18 Mar 2010 In a letter obtained by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), the 9/11 Commission was refused permission to question terror suspects, with the Bush administration arguing that by doing so the panel would "cross" a "line" and obstruct the administration's efforts to protect the nation. Citing the need to "Safeguard the national security, including protection of Americans from [their] future terrorist attacks," the government officials demanded the Commission not make further attempts at conducting a deeper probe into the September 11 terror attacks. [Right, they didn't want people to know that 9/11 was an inside job. Gibbs and DiNozzo would have had theinvestigation wrapped up in the first 42 minutes of 'NCIS.' Abby's mass spectrometer would reveal the explosive residue in WTC 1, 2 and 'Lucky' Larry 'the smartest thing to do is pull it' Silverstein's WTC 7 (not even hit by any planes), which was announced on the BBC as having fallen about a half hour before it a.... Oops! McGee would analyze the insider trading (Pre-9/11 Put Options on Companies Hurt by Attack Indicates Foreknow...) and have the whole kit and caboodle delivered with lots of time remaining for Tony and Ziva to do the flirt thing. I have an entire script penned. CBS: Are you interested? --LRP]


'9/11 panel was warned not to probe too deeply'
Thu, 18 Mar 2010 02:57:39 GMT
Font size :
Leaked info shows the 9/11 Commission was warned against crossing the lines in its probes.
Leaked confidential documents have revealed that senior officials from the former US administration had warned a 9/11 investigation panel against probing too deeply into the terrorist attacks.

In a letter obtained by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), the 9/11 Commission was refused permission to question terror suspects, with the Bush administration arguing that by doing so the panel would "cross" a "line" and obstruct the administration's efforts to protect the nation.

Citing the need to "Safeguard the national security, including protection of Americans from future terrorist attacks," the government officials demanded the Commission not make further attempts at conducting a deeper probe into the September 11 terror attacks.

"As the officers of the United States responsible for the law enforcement, defense and intelligence functions of the Government, we urge your Commission not to further pursue the proposed request to participate in the questioning of detainees," the letter said.

The warning note dated January 6, 2004 has been signed by former Attorney General John Ashcroft, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and CIA Director George Tenet.

The 9/11 Commission was set up in November 2002 to prepare a full account of the circumstances surrounding the attacks, which still have an air of suspicion around them.

The revelation comes as according to a recent survey, one-quarter of US adults believe that the 2001 terrorist attacks were fabricated.

Views: 38

Comment

You need to be a member of 9/11 Scholars Forum to add comments!

Join 9/11 Scholars Forum

Comment by sandy rose on March 20, 2010 at 10:04am
hi Thoth II,
thanks for your comments, good points. yes, we certainly are up against
a mountain of corrupt and heartless poor excuses for human beings. no doubt.
and of course they've tried to cover their tracks by carting off the evidence and
stifling anyone who speaks up against them. and yeah, man, the internet!
wow, where would we have been without it, right?
and i have great fears that they will try to pull out all stops if they feel the
walls closing in, and of course they can cause great damage and destruction.
personally i think they have big threats hanging over congress' fat heads that
they will cause all kind of hell if congress doesn''t keep their traps shut. they have
been told enough times, and they're not completely stupid, they've had way
more time than anyone ever needed to find out about the inside job, but they
continue to cover it up and hope it will go away.
but truthers are steadfast and many and strong, and even tho we don't
have tons of money or bombs or armies, like you said, we have the truth.

and no amount of strategy can wipe out the truth no matter how hard
they try or how many people they kill.

i think things like the leaking of the 'don't probe too deeply' order are
PRICELESS, and who knows what else might leak out in the future. that
for me was a pretty nice admission of guilt on their parts, because their
wimpy excuse about protecting us from attacks blah blah blah doesn't
even make sense, and they always use that nashnul skurity bull when
they have things to hide.
the timing on that leakage is great, what with this stupid fake trial
of that dude who was waterboarded 80 some times coming up. i
guess they think once they convict and kill him it will be all over.
it's really freaky to be in the midst of all of this, and horrid to have
a new 'president' who keeps the assinine wars going, and starts more
to boot! and helps to cover up the truth about 9/11. it's on the other
hand FANTASTIC how our truth community has grown, it is everywhere,
and people have done a great job of getting it all down in print/video/etc.
we have done a great job even without a lot of money, bombs or armies
and in the long run i believe it will all pay off, tho it sure is a slow process.

and yeah, Jesse has been an awesome part of this, saw him briefly
on the Joy Behar show, i think her name is, while nooze skimming, and
she admitted to being somewhat of a conspiracy theorist also! where
does one find Jesse's show in the fall?

i think we should always keep up hope, we dun good so far with
what little we have, and there's always reason for hope. carry on!
Comment by Thoth II on March 19, 2010 at 11:18am
I think it is hard to say if we are getting anywhere. On our side is the truth, always a big advantage over lies, and also the internet to spread the word. Against us are the power centers: banking, corporations, media, corrupt public officials . But I get a feeling that the dark side had a free ride since JFK, but that is morphing into something else. Look at the high ratings Jesse Ventura's show had and that series has been renewed for the fall. And I think they are rethinking their strategy, they no longer can just slough us off as kooks. They are making outrageous statements linking truthers to domestic terrorists, and that probably means they're getting scared they won't be able to control events any longer. And maybe at the top it's cracking too, and the various power centers are privately quarrelling with each other over strategy.
Comment by sandy rose on March 19, 2010 at 6:59am
WHOA! this is huge! yeah, i was gonna post this here, glad to see it
already made the rounds! thanks Jim. i find it rather mind blowing and
exciting.
thanks much to Lori Price for consistently bringing us the REAL news,
with a great sense of humor to boot! (subscribe to clg news if ya don't already)
this sheds a little hope on our doomsday fears.
i'm really pleased that the mighty fine ACLU went after this, i did not
know they KNEW.
and bless whomever took it upon themselves to LEAK this! leak away!

and now i'm curious as to what survey this was. SURVEY SAYS......
9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB. hey, pretty dang great also that a QUARTER
of people surveyed knew, too, and weren't too timid to say so. you go, people!
(i bet in reality it was more than that but some don't have the stones to say so.)

and what possible (good) reason could bash and co. have for hushing
up the omission? sure as heck makes em look plenty guilty!
i for one think this is HUGE, glad to see it making the rounds, it should
be sent to alllllll 9/11 truthers. and anyone else who might need to know.
could we actually be getting somewhere?
Comment by Thoth II on March 18, 2010 at 4:00pm
"The 9/11 Commission was set up in November 2002 to prepare a full account of the circumstances surrounding the attacks, which still have an air of suspicion around them. "

Just like the Warren Commission was set up. The parallels, again are there. The WC artist was not even shown autopsy photos but just was ordered to draw misleading diagrams, what a farce. Key witnesses were excluded, others had their arms twisted to lie. Even the WC commissioners were a farcical arrangement: the Washington boys, Dulles, Ford (Hoover's errand boy), and McCloy ran it, and excluded the southern wing like Sen. Russell from key meetings , no doubt because he ordered his OWN investigation and concluded that the CIA and cubans were responsible.

911 commission was a similar farce, not appointed to investigate, but cover up. Like Jim Marrs says, when will the people ever learn?

© 2019   Created by James H. Fetzer.   Powered by

Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service