9/11 Scholars Forum

Exposing Falsehoods and Revealing Truths

Challenge to WABC/New York License Renewal based upon Broadcasting Fake Videos

Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 19:36:46 -0800 [09:36:46 PM CST]
From: "Scott Summers"
To: [Show addresses - 71 recipients]
Subject: Truthtelling Radio Show

Listen To The Interview
http://iamthewitness.com/audio/Texe.Marrs/TFC.2006.06.20.Tue.Marrs.mp3

______________________________________________________________________________
Joint doctrine states that "the fact that deception was used on an operation should be protected. both to allow the use of the same techniques and tactics in later deception operations, and to protect sensitive deception means"

The same basic Hollywood deception technique is being repeated over and over again.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IJ4DroG2X1E
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nOMHSgQuuiw

--- On Mon, 11/2/09, Scott Summers wrote:

From: Scott Summers
Subject: We Almost Had em
To: piperm2@lycos.com, Tillawi@aol.com, jconditjr@fuse.net, garygiuffre@att.net, nicohaupt2@yahoo.com, angieSept11@yahoo.com, lionesslynn2000@yahoo.com, smith@iamthewitness.com, flierflylilly@yahoo.com, salbuchi@infovia.com.ar, blamming@yahoo.com, jlamming@gmail.com, skylax@comcast.net, ognir2@gmail.com, indylake@live.com, evanlong@earthlink.net, Jeff.gates@criminalstate.com, jessesonolee@gmail.com, rabbitholecentral@earthlink.net, vtap@hotmail.com, lisajudy@nctv.com, econrn@suddenlink.net, jfetzer@d.umn.edu, ueritemarg@gmail.com, webfairy@thewebfairy.com, leonardjp@earthlink.net, rrod530675@gmail.com, webstertarpley@yahoo.com, progpress@verizon.net, eyeswideoopen@yahoo.com, bronathanael@yahoo.com, Shensingoumi19@aol.com, jwalter@walden3.org, caroltheartist@aol.com, totalinfo@gmail.com, metazeph@gmail.com, killtown@yahoo.com, tffoti@msn.com, geogpob-unforgiven@yahoo.com, elijames@anglo-saxonisrael.com, suppressed.911.evidence@911blimp.net, vyzygoth@hotmail.com, annie@anniemachon.com, ruby23@adelphia.net, ewraven1@sympatico.ca, andreapsoras@earthlink.net, joefriendly@earthlink.net, melnn@mac.com, craigbhill@gmail.com, dao69@verizon.net, diane1029@hotmail.com, crystal718@comcast.net, eric@vaticanassassins.org, redicecreations@gmail.com, fredrik@redicecreations.com, henrik.palmgren@bredband.net, prothink@yahoo.com, khanversemc@yahoo.com, brayman1490@motmail.com, sisyphus1285@cs.com, wingedpiper@yahoo.com, olfriend@nwinfo.net, hmakow@gmail.com, jewishracism@yahoo.com, bollyn.books@yahoo.com, painfulquestions@aol.com, jpetras@binghamton.edu, henry@henrymakow.com, prophecy@texemarrs.com, "Coffinman"
Date: Monday, November 2, 2009, 7:24 PM

Instead of pursuing the follwing, the 9/11 truth movement was channeled by psyOPS into talking about Cheney's Wargames, Silverstein's Demolitions, Neocons and Thermite. Had we put our energy behind the following issue, this battle would have been won long ago. This is precisely what Alex Jones, Jeff Rense, Mike Rivero, Ralph Schoenman, Loose Change and all the other phonies were set up to channel us away from.

Copied from total411.info
9/11 TV fakery: WABC license challenge refused by FCC
FYI:

May 30, 2008

HAND-DELIVERED
ATTN: Video Division, License Renewal Processing Team
Room 2-A665
Office of the Secretary
Federal Communications Commission
c/o Natek, Inc.
236 Massachusetts Ave., N.E.
Suite 110
Washington, DC 20002

RE: Station call sign: WABC (Channel 7)
City and State: New York, New York
Station facility Identification number: 1328
License renewal application file number: BRCT-20070201BHD

I am writing this letter of informal objection to the broadcast license renewal of television station Channel 7 WABC located in New York, New York.

Although I am not currently a resident of WABC's broadcast market, I have standing to file this informal complaint regarding WABC's license renewal in that I object to a WABC broadcast which was simulcast and rebroadcast nationally, and I travel to WABC's broadcast market at least once a year and indeed did dwell in WABC's broadcast market at the time of its last broadcast license renewal in 1999.

My objection to WABC's renewal regards, specifically, the images broadcast by the station on September 11, 2001. After close review of the footage broadcast at approximately 9:03 a.m. that day, as simulcast nationwide by AMERICAN BROADCASTING COMPANIES, INC (the holder of WABC's license), Fox News Channel, and others, I have come to the conclusion that the images of an "airplane" purportedly broadcast live was in fact a real-time animation inserted by the WESCAM camera system which WABC was broadcasting that morning.

The evidence for this conclusion is several-fold, the most notable and graspable perhaps being the "stop-motion" nature of the plane image across several frames, rather than a blur of "go-motion" which would have been left by a genuine photographic image of a flying airplane. You may verify this by examination of WABC's archives. I have carefully examined my personal VHS recording of Fox News Channel's rebroadcast of the WABC footage which revealed this stop-animation.

I do not know or allege whether this false broadcast was done out of negligence or malice aforethought. But given the ramifications this broadcast has had on the United States republic, including but not limited to two foreign military actions and passage of laws and executive orders which curb Constitutional liberties, even negligence would disqualify WABC from having its license renewed as the broadcast was a gross violation of the public interest and no remedial steps have been taken by WABC to correct it.

Please consider this informal complaint as you undertake the license renewal process of New York's American Broadcasting Companies, Inc.'s owned and operated Channel 7 WABC's license to operate on the public airwaves. I am hopeful that the FCC will keep in mind the public's objections to this station as the FCC reviews the application to renew the operating licenses for ABC Channel 7 television station. . .

Sincerely,

REDACTED

______________________________________________________________________________
Joint doctrine states that "the fact that deception was used on an operation should be protected. both to allow the use of the same techniques and tactics in later deception operations, and to protect sensitive deception means"

The same basic Hollywood deception technique is being repeated over and over again.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IJ4DroG2X1E
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nOMHSgQuuiw

Views: 418

Comment

You need to be a member of 9/11 Scholars Forum to add comments!

Join 9/11 Scholars Forum

Comment by Thoth II on September 6, 2010 at 5:02pm
Stuff like this is encouraging. It means a lot of people really finally do get it, although it's taken about 10 years for some, better late than never. Too bad it has to funnel through another federal agency like the FCC, and the chances aren't much better it'll get anywhere than if it landed on the desk of the secretaries of the NTSB, or ilk. Still, maybe a few people in these agencies will start seeing this stuff, and if human history is any judge, the human spirit can't be broken by a few evil dictators. Maybe stuff like this will create "ice cracks" in the monolith that'll eventually bring the whole chibang down, it did in the ex soviet union.
Comment by Bill Giltner on September 3, 2010 at 5:25pm
When one tries to click the 2nd youtube link, a copyright violation shows the message as captured here: http://r3.sharedcopy.com/2ginu
Comment by Bill Giltner on September 3, 2010 at 5:15pm
A link to this post has been archived at the 9/11 Truth Archive.

The link is here.

© 2019   Created by James H. Fetzer.   Powered by

Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service