Is 9/11 research "anti-Semitic"?

[James H. Fetzer]

Your article: Is 9/11 Research "anti-Semitic"?
Author: Jim Fetzer

Description: Attacks upon 9/11 research have reached an extreme point where FOX host
Glenn Beck has gone so far as to claim the 9/11 truth movement is a threat to the
national security of the US. Comparisons with Holocaust deniers are rampant. Yet there is
no basis for that analogy and the only "threat" to national security is the one posed by
exposing 9/11 as having been "an inside job", for which there is extensive and powerful
proof.

Tags: Anti-semitism, Argument, Belief, Crime, Energy, Evidence, Hitler, Holocaust,
Physics, Religion, Truth, Zionism

Article Location:
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Is-9-11-Research-Anti-Sem-by-Jim-Fetzer-090615-95.html

Is 9_11 Research "Anti-Semitic".pdf

[James H. Fetzer]

Again, I think you are right on the mark, Thoth II. Here is
a link to my study, "Thinking about 'Conspiracy Theories':
9/11 and JFK", which introduces the principles of science
that should be applied to cases of this kind. Find it here:

http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/fetzerexpandedx.htm

[Thoth II]

I think we can infer that there is evidence for multiple groups being involved in 911 : people in the Bush administration, Mossad, CIA, military/aerospace companies , maybe others

I think there is a good analogy with JFK, because there, there were many groups who had a powerful interest in taking him out: chiefs of staff (military) ; CIA; anti-Castro Cuban groups, to name a few.

Usually these "big lies" have to involve many of the top ruling entities in a country in order that they can pull off the coverup afterwards. The perps have to know they will be supported forever by the establishment afterwards; like in JFK they've smothered the truth for 50 years and I think that speaks powerfully as to high up the food chain the conspiracy went.

[James H. Fetzer]

Well, I complicated the situation a bit in relation to accessibility by submitting it twice, which led to the existence of two URLs, one of which is non-functioning. The situation regarding access is somewhat better. If you go to the home page, they now have a list of "hot pages" at the top, where "911" is among them. This article is currently #2 on that list. Check it out. Anything you can do to promote it with other 9/11 sites, for example, would be welcome. But don't be surprised to encounter resistance. I am still banned at blogger. I do worry just a bit about Rob, especially given his comments about the paper. The links were a good thing to add to it.

[Curtis Sherwood]

Jim, you do know OpEdNews hid your article within 48 hours of your putting it up, right? I don't know if you're aware of this or not, but Rob Kall has "banished" such articles and diaries to what he calls "the edge" which in affect moves information he deams as too controversial for the main page to the "edges" page. Strangely enough, your article does not even appear there. It can only be found by first searching your name or by using the URL I used on the COTO page ;

http://www.opednews.com/articles/3/Is-9-11-Research-Anti-Sem-by-Jim-Fetzer-090615-95.html

The Conspirama appearance works although it is somewhat hidden. I have no idea who added that there and I have no influence at all over the way it is displayed there, nor on The Progressive Mind for that matter. THAT posting has indeed disappeared. I searched the complete site to no avail. Not sure what the reasons are but again, I have zero influence over these things. Have your tried I.C.H or HuffPost? What about all the other 911 Bolgs? Have they picked this up or are they willing to carry it?

BTW, Kall deserves a boot in the behind for the things he said about you. One friend recently said that the only thing a true progressive would bother posting at Kall's site os a grocery list, at most. It's a gatekeeper site and they're not friendly to the 911 truth movement. Tolerable to a certain point, yes, but not friendly.

[James H. Fetzer]

Curtis, Make sure they have the right link, which is on this forum. I'll check it and put it up here right now:
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Is-9-11-Research-Anti-Sem-by-Jim-Fetzer-090615-95.html I have noticed
that a couple of sites featuring it have the wrong link, including "Conspirama" and "The Progressive Mind":

Conspirama - Is 9/11 Research ?Anti-Semitic?? by Jim Fetzer « C.O.T.O.
Jun 18, 2009 ... Madison, WI (OpEdNews) June 16, 2009 ? A kind of hysteria regarding 9/11
research has surfaced in multiple forms, the most blatant of which ...
conspirama.com/9-11/Is_911_Research_ldquoAnti-Semiticrdquo_by_Jim_ Fetzer_%AB_C-O-T-O-/ -
57 minutes ago - Similar -

DOES NOTHING (probably linked to the nonfunctional 090617-821.html)

The Progressive Mind » Is 9/11 Research ?Anti-Semitic?? by Jim ...
Jun 18, 2009 ... To contend that a person's research on 9/11, for example, cannot be
taken seriously because they are anti-Semitic is parallel to discounting ...
www.theprogressivemind.info/?p=17030 - 1 hour ago - Similar -

GIVE ME A PAGE SAYING "NOT FOUND" (probably linking to the old html)

So you might want to check it to make sure they are using the right link to reach the article. Many thanks!

[Curtis Sherwood]

Jim, this is rolling properly on wordpress ; http://cotocrew.wordpress.com/2009/06/18/is-911-research-anti-semitic-by-jim-fetzer/

and has been picked up by http://www.theprogressivemind.info/?p=17030

OEN has loads of readers but are you aware of Kall's shell games? He hides stuff he doesn't want all those readers to read or see. BWO's diary was deleted, your article hidden. What does this say for OEN?

[James H. Fetzer]

Absolutely! I am concerned that it appears to be bottled up. I very much want it to get out. Distribute it as far and wide as possible.

[Curtis Sherwood]

Jim, with your permission, I'll post your article along with a link to the OEN page on http://cotocrew.wordpress.com/ . I've already voiced my opinion of OEN in a seperate e-mail to you so no reason to go over that again, unless of course, you would like to know how COTO came to be. Mr. Kall banned me from his site last year, for reasons not related to your article, 9/11 or the subject of your article, so you won't be seeing any comments bearing my signature on OEN. The same applies to most all members of the COTO site btw.

[James H. Fetzer]

There are some interesting comments on "Is 9/11 research 'anti-Semitic'?", including two from Michael Morrissey.
Please visit http://www.opednews.com/articles/Is-9-11-Research-Anti-Sem-by-Jim-Fetzer-090615-95.html and
review them, because this is a new thread that is beginning to have interesting dimensions. I would encourage
you to share this article with others, because it needs to become widely disseminated--and it's not getting out.