9/11 Scholars Forum

Exposing Falsehoods and Revealing Truths

On the possible use of mini-nukes on the Twin Towers . . .


The twin towers and Bldg 7 were taken down by Nuclear Demolition Charges - Dimitri Khalezov
They didn't call it "ground zero" for nothing! Before 911, ground zero only meant the area below or above a nuclear detonation, after 911, they changed some of the dictionaries
to say it was also the place where terrorists attacked the trade
centers. It's all mind control.

Dimitri Khalezov has
been an expert in nuclear demolition for many years and has an
incredible amount of proof that the buildings were taken down by
underground micro nuclear demolition charges! I've posted some links to
other material such as the melted cars that could have only been done
by EMP type effects caused by a nuclear bomb since there was no jet fuel
burning at ground level AND some of these cars were missing engine
blocks! They were totally melted! How do you melt an engine block when
no fire was burning at ground level - many of these cars were 7 blocks
away! They were never explained in any way. Also it was never
explained why Tritium levels were 55 times more than normal
at ground zero. And of course we have ALL the strange cancers from
first responders and many of them have died. They were forced to wear
"air quality" badges which Dimitri says were really just radiation
detectors in disguise so they could monitor everybody's exposure and
pull people out of the hot zones for a while when their badges reported
higher radiation. Easy to lie to everybody and tell them the badge is
to monitor air quality. That is pure garbage if you think about it.
There is not going to be that much difference in "air quality around
such a relatively small area anyway.

Dimitri even said that in the 70's he was told that the Americans had authorized the twin towers to be taken down at the end of their lifetimes with small nuclear demolition charges! I did some research
and it was true! It was determined that only a nuclear demolition
charge could safely bring down both Towers and Building 7 because of
their construction. Here's some good information on nuclear demolition

Can you believe that? Here I find out that the original PLAN for the trade towers was to take them down by nuclear demolition charges and nobody in our government or press reported this! Of course they didn't
want that information reported because people would start putting the
pieces together. The Russians knew it because they were informed of it
in the 70s. Dimitri even remembers everybody getting a good laugh at
the crazy Americans plan to destroy a skyscraper with a nuclear
demolition charge when he was a young man working in the field.
Apparently the Sears tower in Chicago also will be taken down by a 150
Kt nuclear demolition charge at the end of its life also. If you ever
see that one fall down by after a bombing or airplane and it comes down
all nice and neat you can be sure that a demolition nuke brought that
down too because the experts concluded that only a nuclear demolition
charge could do it properly.

Information about Melted Cars many blocks away from Ground Zero
This was not caused by Jet Fuel! There was no jet fuel even on the ground. Some of these melted cars were 7 blocks away from the buildings! There
was no fire anywhere near these vehicles and jet fuel can't melt engine
blocks anyway! Only an EMP from a nuclear detonation or a energy weapon
can do this. There is no other explanation of all the melted cars.
But those cars weren't mentioned in the report either!

Video on Melted Cars

Video on Melted Cars

Information about Tritium Levels

I feel the nuclear demolition theory is the best theory I've heard that
explains everything that never made sense to me about 911! The way the
government reacted, the melted cars, the melted steel being found months
after the buildings came down even though there was nothing that could
have even come close to melting steel in those buildings. Jet fuel
won't do it if it burned for a million years. In a nuclear test, it
takes a year for the ground around the blast to cool after the
detonation if you do nothing to help it cool. It took 6 months of
pouring water and all kinds of other things on the rubble pile to cool
it so it makes sense that this can only happen if it was done by a
nuclear demolition charge because that is the minimum you could cool it
if you tried your hardest.

Dimitri also got unofficial verification of his work by the FBI. If you
watch the entire video series you will see what I'm talking about. I was
BLOWN away when I did my own research and found out that Nelson
Rockefeller, hired "Controlled Demolition Inc" on how the WTC towers
could be taken down at the end of their life span because they had to
submit the demolition plan before they were allowed to build. They
concluded that ONLY a nuclear demolition charge would take down the
building cleanly because it was so rigid and tall! This is in the public
record. This Russian nuclear demolition expert even heard about the
nuclear demolition plan in the 70s and the Russians were laughing at how
the Americans would actually propose using a nuclear demolition charge
to take down this structure. Here's a link that has some history on
nuclear demolition also.

Tags: 911, demolition, nuclear

Reply to This

Views: 71


You need to be a member of 9/11 Scholars Forum to add comments!

Join 9/11 Scholars Forum

Comment by James H. Fetzer on August 19, 2010 at 4:27pm
I have just added as a new blog an email from a chemical engineer, Mark Hightower, that is highly relevant here.
Comment by Thoth II on August 19, 2010 at 3:33pm

I do agree that the experts who favor the nuclear hypothesis are correct with the ideas of fusion devices because of the clear evidence of the heavy hydrogen isotopes (deuterium and tritium at GZ). That is one of the main reasons I've always believed this hypothesis. As for the 3rd or 4th generation, I've lost counting so I wouldn't know , but undoubtedly these well paid govt. scientists (or contractors paid by govt.) have not been idle these many decades since Hiroshima. I also heard one expert comment that the cancers of people around GZ are consistent with nukes.

Time will probably tell as this issue "cools down" at little and more scientists get the guts (or security of wealth) to speak out. Since scientists invented these devices, it'll probably take scientists to speak out someday to answer these technical issues definitely.
Comment by James H. Fetzer on August 18, 2010 at 9:36pm
The sources who have supported this theory have talked about 3rd or 4th generation nukes, including pure fusion devices, which they support with high levels of deuterium and of tritium at Ground Zero. Thoughts?
Comment by Shallel Octavia on August 18, 2010 at 9:03pm
It would be impossible to hide the flash of mini-nukes. The emission of very high energy photons, called gamma rays would blind half of lower Manhattan. The temperatures of fusion nuclear explosions can go up into the millions of kelvin. The "Little Boy"that exploded in Hiroshima had a huge damaging effect. The temperature of this fission reaction was about 300,000 kelvin at the center and about 6000 kelvin on the ground below.
Comment by Thoth II on August 18, 2010 at 8:50am
I've always thought it was mini nukes and am more convinced now than ever. We'll see over time which theory holds up, but I'll be very surprised if it wasn't mini nukes. They explain all the evidence I think.

© 2021   Created by James H. Fetzer.   Powered by

Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service