9/11 Scholars Forum

Exposing Falsehoods and Revealing Truths

Review of Dimiti Khalezov's work on the WTC destruction. Pt. 2


He's certainly good on the planes, again here he should cite Professor Reynolds,
but he brings some good new information to the table, citing the use of Wolfram and DU, high density materials used in penetrating shells.

His knowledge of 9/11 researchers is quite extensive. He devastates the CD Hypothesis calling it's leading proponent David Ray Griffin, as well as Steven Jones' Thermate scenario quite handily and in great depth. He dispenses with the OCT like it was 1, 2, 3.

He also take on the theories of directed energy weapons, (who's most famous proponents he says are Wood and Reynolds) detailing his version of the court cases, and why they were dismissed, calling them "clueless" and "lunatics". Not very sporting, Chap.
He concludes that such a weapon would require the energy of a thermonuclear weapon to turn the towers to ash, so why not just use the nuke directly. He attributes the odd melting damage on the "toasted cars" as a staged diversion to suggest a mini nuke EMP, since it could be used as a limited hangout and blamed on patsies named bin Laden, Hussein, Silverstein, the Mossad, or the Freemasons rather than the government itself.

He moves on to invalidate William Tahil's reactor explosion, stating (correctly) that a reactor could never explode, only melt.

"(If someone thinks about Chernobyl at this point – it is better to forget about it, because the Chernobyl was a pure sample of a public cheating – an ensuing the Chernobyl “disaster” governmental cover-up was not any better than that in the case of the 9/11 attacks. The only difference between the Chernobyl “disaster” and 9/11 in this sense was that while the actual nuclear dangers at Manhattan’s ground zero were intentionally underestimated, in the case of the Chernobyl the alleged nuclear dangers were greatly exaggerated. From the technical point of view the
Chernobyl “disaster” was a pure act of sabotage. The reactor in the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant did not explode itself, it was “helped” to be exploded – by a “mini-nuke” smuggled into and placed under the reactor. However, it would not be appropriate to further discuss it here, since our current topic is different). The point is that a core of an overheated nuclear reactor can not explode."

He thanks Tahil anyway for an interesting book and his phrase, "Nuclear Madness"

He then comes back to his "spiteful critics belonging to the little army of Judy Wood's admirers". (I guess this includes me indirectly.) He mentions the lack of damage to the "bathtub" keeping the East River out of the WTC foundation. He claims that the damage was reported as serious:


“Crews at the World Trade Center site are rushing to fix a 90-foot-wide hole in the retaining wall that keeps out ground water……The collapse of the south tower tore the large gash in the wall September 11”

While he is skeptical of the seismic data, he take the USGS thermal images, molten metal, melting boots and all that were real, and he details the orange hot steel being picked up by standard hydraulic grapplers, citing many witnesses to the high temperatures.


He doesn't seem to get the steam explosions that would have occurred if water came in contact with that kind of temperature.

He goes on to detail the radioactivity, its projected dose and how they kept workers below acute levels of exposure, but there were hazmat suits for those who were "in the know". His favorite perps seem to be named Rockefeller, Loizeaux, Giuliani, Silverstein, and Robertson as well as the Ops in WTC7.

I cannot say he's convinced me, though this is much more plausible than any other nuke theory, of which he thoroughly and correctly refutes both the mini- nukes above ground (blinding light, blast wave, direct radiation, and EMP pulse) theory, and the reactor explosion theory. I recommend serious scholars of the 9/11 event to look for his forthcoming new edition, I will be.

Relevant Khalezov links:

www.dkhalezov.fromru.su | www.dkhalezov.com | www.911thology.com | www.911thology.cn | www.3truth911.com

Views: 151

Comment

You need to be a member of 9/11 Scholars Forum to add comments!

Join 9/11 Scholars Forum

© 2024   Created by James H. Fetzer.   Powered by

Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service