9/11 Scholars Forum

Exposing Falsehoods and Revealing Truths

http://www.septembercoup.com/911.htm  Check this out.  What I have read so far is completely brilliant!

How Did The WTC Towers Fall So Easily?
Melting 110-Stories of Steel and Concrete in just 57 Minutes
How did three huge skyscrapers implode within :10 seconds or less?

WTC 7 Destruction, Madrid Fire Are Keys To Unraveling 9/11

By Tim Watts

A Basic Understanding

Despite the differing opinions and countless theories which have been discussed and vehemently argued over concerning 9/11, one thing is painfully clear, this event was very well planned, with skilled military precision and strategic execution. This was a daring assault of monolithic proportions, outrageous in its temerity. No matter who was responsible, it was undeniably an orchestrated conspiracy. That much is fact.

Whoever was behind the planning was certainly no rookie. Clearly there was big money behind the operation, but more importantly, there was quite obviously a very high degree of skilled intelligence involved. By that, I am referring to alphabet state intel.

Whether that intel was foreign military or state sponsored, or merely a rogue splinter faction, it was indeed a valuable key in the success of the 9/11 attacks, an event which has become the primary catalyst of constitutional change for the United States, but also the pretext for war in the middle-east and North Africa.

The sad, perverse irony in all of this is that the United States claims to be bringing democracy to the many countries we've invaded, all the while it's being taken from us here at home.

The epic horror and cold brutality of this disaster, brought immediate public outcry, as well as a united grief and an outflow of compassion that did briefly unify the people momentarily, however, in just a short amount of time this infamous event has now become a contentious boiling point for many in the international community, while at the same time forming an indisputable divide among Americans.

Where We Are Now

Clearly the most acrimonious division has formed among the people of the United States. You either believe the government theory or you don't. If you should choose to recognize an alternative theory for 9/11, contrary to the official version, you are the one that is labeled as the conspiracy theorist, even though the government's version is perhaps much harder to believe than many of the alternative explanations.

There are still some who are, for whatever reason, either ambivalent or indifferent on the issue, however, the overall mass perceptions that exist today appear to be firmly entrenched and thus have become quite divisive. Many of these perceptions have been manufactured and nurtured by a non-inquisitive media that complicitly parrots the official government version. Those who resist that narrative are those who have explored alternative media and performed independent research on their own. It essentially comes down to coerced opinions versus learned opinions.

There are essentially three primary camps of thought that are being argued about regarding the 9/11 issue:

  • The 9/11 plot that totally defeated numerous airport security checks, World Trade Center security & surveillance systems, FBI and CIA intelligence services, all active NORAD military defense measures, as well as local built in Pentagon defense mechanisms... was meticulously coordinated and executed by Osama bin Laden and his band of Al Qaeda terrorists. This is the DKIWH theory, Didn't Know It Would Happen.  

  • The 9/11 attacks were learned of by some U.S. officials who were warned early on by intel from many countries, but who chose instead to sit on that information, using the opportunity as a new Pearl Harbor, in order to engage in preemptive wars of aggression in the middle-east and North Africa, by being complicit regarding the attacks, if not odiously helping to facilitate them in order to justify their wars of imperialism. This is the LIHOP theory, Let It Happen On Purpose. 

  • The 9/11 event was orchestrated and deliberately engineered solely by rogue government intelligence services, using the the alleged hijackers as mere patsies in the plot. The impetus for such a false flag operation include the spoils from scenario two, but with the primary objective being the enactment of a world-wide police state, the dissolution of the United States, and the emergence of the long planned new world order. This is the MIHOP theory, Made It Happen On Purpose.

Out of the three outlined scenarios above, there appear to be two distinctive theories that emerge. One, that the U.S. government was innocently or ignorantly caught by surprise and totally bungled the defense of the country. The other is, whether exploited or heinously engineered, a rogue faction of our government explicitly used the event for its own nefarious agenda.

That's about as mixed as you can get on the topic, and that's clearly not a good thing for getting at the truth. As a result, this has divided people into two camps, those that naively trust and believe the government explanation of 9/11, versus those who have methodically explored the evidence and do not believe the official story.

From an analytical point of view, one thing is obvious in looking at these two divided factions; one of the two groups has been exposed to both sides of the story, while one absolutely refuses to look.

As a result of this dichotomous contrast and its resulting contentious debate, both sides vehemently resist the other, if not wholeheartedly resent the other. This contention, along with its deeply impassioned emotion, is often rooted with a strong patriotic underscore from both sides, making the issue quite divisive and socially volatile.

So the question is, how do we move on from where we are now?

We were all shown those awful events that day, repeatedly, as they played over and over again on our televisions. Each and every one of us saw with our own eyes the catastrophic events as they unfolded that day, albeit through a construed media lens.

Like everything else in life, our current perceptions of 9/11 have been carefully formed and coerced, if not outright manipulated, through an openly gullible trust of our corporate news media. We all saw the attacks with our own eyes, yet we have continually been bombarded by a complicit media to buy into an official story that arguably has more glaring holes and inadequacies than any of the so-called conspiracy theories. It is often argued that the real conspiracy theory is the government's official version.

The government wants you to believe: That 19 men, divided into four groups, not armed with guns or explosives, but with mere simple box-cutters, were able to bypass security at three major airports, overwhelm the crew and passengers of four airplanes despite being greatly outnumbered, fly the planes with little or no piloting skills, easily defeating well structured long standing U.S. air defense systems, skillfully steering three of the mammoth jetliners unabated into their designated targets, crumbling the twin towers in a near free fall fashion into their own footprints in ten seconds or less, while also striking the Pentagon, the most secure structure within the most guarded airspace in the entire world, which was somehow left undefended, even after declaring that America was already under attack over half an hour (:34 minutes), before it was hit by a plane that had its transponder off for :41 minutes! There was no intercept of that obvious hijack, nor either of the New York flights which had transponders off for :26 and :17 minutes respectively. The military tried to muster an air defense, but just couldn't get there in time.

Those searching for a more reasoned explanation suggest: That a rogue group of high ranking government individuals, with complete control and unfettered access to Federal aviation systems and U.S. military operations, either exploited an uncovered terrorist plot, or engineered a false flag operation of their own, to attack symbolic targets in the country, all of which held beneficial side gain to U.S. officials from either their substantial wealth resources, or else crucial incriminating records that needed to be destroyed, all conveniently contained within the targets, all the while initiating an environment of fear and panic that could be used to consolidate government power through the restriction of rights, while enabling an excuse for unprovoked wars that immediately benefit the military industrial complex, the corporate elite, and the PNAC (Project for a New American Century), the latter which penned a document in September of 2000 entitled "Rebuilding America's Defenses,"  which openly talked of a new Pearl Harbor in order to facilitate its agenda.

While both plots may be hard to conceive, the fact of the matter is, the last one outlined is arguably much easier to achieve, due to the overwhelming number of PNAC members that were strategically positioned in key government seats of power. A neo-con mechanism was clearly enabled within the Bush-Cheney administration that possessed the ability to implement strategy and achieve the goals set forth by the PNAC. (See more on the PNAC's access to power further in this article.)

Some are understandably scared to look at an alternative theory, afraid of having their world upset with a national revelation too ugly for them to personally bare, or fearful of being denounced as "being against us," thus being accused of not supporting the country, but for others, a search for the truth is the only recourse in dealing with an event of such horrific destruction and cold-blooded mass murder.

Never being one to wait for an epiphany from the media, I began this exploration in search of answers that every single American has the right to know. What really happened on September 11th, 2001 that caused our politicians to change the world around us so much?


More at http://www.septembercoup.com/911.htm

Views: 486

Comment

You need to be a member of 9/11 Scholars Forum to add comments!

Join 9/11 Scholars Forum

Comment by Thoth II on January 7, 2012 at 11:25am

I myself still think Chuck Boldwyn is right on with his hypothesis about a combo. thermite/mini nukes.

He also thinks Judy Wood 's DEW is total fantastic bunk, and I totally agree.  I will be floored if DEW turns out in the end to be the "winning H" in the stable of horses.

I am NOT saying that DEW weaponry is not used effectively by the military, it certainly is; anywhere from surgical attacks on tanks up to killing Paul Wellstone.  However, not on 911 for this reason:  the power sources from the DEW would not have been practical to turn the twin towers to dust in 10 seconds, nowhere near enough.  That is a whole different energy regime and took nukes to do the heavy lifting.  Plus I have other reasons we've discussed many times about the details of the physics.

Comment by Jeannon Kralj on January 7, 2012 at 10:10am

Not impressed.  Read half of it and skimmed rest.  Smells of the thermite gang to me, but with a few new twists.

Now DEWs and video fakery are blended in.

 

Would be very interested in Dr. Morgan Reynolds' take on this article.

 

I thought the idea that the Madrid buidling event may have been set up to be used to refute official-therory-questioners of 9-11 was quite interesting.  This fits in with Dr. Fetzer's "onion" hypothesis. 

 

Only mentions CFR affiliation as the basic "who did it" clue.  Been there, done that.  Very old stuff.  We need to recognize the Zionist, Mossad, Jewish revolutionary spirit connections.

 

This may be a nicely written and comprehensive article, but to me there is something fundamentally flawed about the reasoning.   I am  disappointed that Dr. Fetzer likes this article. 

 

Comment by Shallel Octavia on January 7, 2012 at 12:41am

Energy that is Directed and used as a Weapon. Not too difficult to understand, really.

Comment by James H. Fetzer on January 6, 2012 at 11:44pm

Danny, I appreciate your reaction to this, but how do you know that exotic weapons were not used on the Twin Towers?  I may be skeptical, too, but I find it difficult, at this stage of investigation, to discount it.  Could you take a look at this study by Dwain Deets regarding WTC-7, which I have always believed was a classic "controlled demolition", and tell me what you think?  Do you appreciate his systematic approach toward the evidence?

http://www.veoh.com/watch/v212078178pCsjh6w?h1=Approaching+the+Puzz...

Comment by Danny White on January 6, 2012 at 11:13pm

This is a very well done and comprehensive post ....hard to stop reading once you start. I was really liking it until I stepped in the DEW. I thought this was going to be the holy grail until I heard all that. I think my personal belief at this point is: 1.No Planes  2.combination of conventional explosives and/or thermate to make the cutouts. 3.jet fuel or diesel to create the black smoke ... maybe just plastic garbage or tires on the top floors.

4.thermate cutter charges to "prep" the towers in the minutes before "dustification" 5.underground directed nuke ...

rumbling,ground shake --- almost 95% x-rays, which might trigger other devices such as: 6.conventional

explosives (? top-down)  bm,bm,bm,bm,bm... or nano stuff sprayed under floor pans.    This is just my 2 cents worth to throw in the pot.  I may be wrong, but it seems

as though the DEWs can't account for strontium and such.  Tim Watts did an outstanding job on this, and I

thank him. I'm not sure why he buys into the exotic weapon thing though. We just need more people to offer

their ideas to figure this crazy thing out.  I know we're on the right track on the planes thing, but we need to

work out the demolition part before we go to print.   ideas, anyone?  ... tnx ...  Danny

Comment by Thoth II on January 5, 2012 at 4:07pm

I'm so glad some people are finally seeing this all clearly.  Until I studied JFK and 911, I did not realize the degree to which all you have to do is KICK UP DUST on any issue, and human beings seem to be totally paralyzed, assuming that dust kicking is coming from sources they trust.  The truth of things is very simple as this author sees, but after this dust kicking, it is so hard to straighten most people's thinking out.  I just at random listen to Thom Hartman, George Noory, whatever , in the standard alternative media, and this confusion is so very evident listening to them.  I really dispise the architects of JFK and 911 for doing this, because they clearly understand what they are doing.  It is so anti-human and devious to the entire world's population.  

© 2021   Created by James H. Fetzer.   Powered by

Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service