Exposing Falsehoods and Revealing Truths
9-11 "truth" goes woo-woo
FYI
Just in case anyone is still interested in 9-11 truth theories and their most recent iterations.
Just my cursory view and have not explored any of these new ideas in any depth. However, I think I see some underlying common threads that have nothing to do with objectively seeking facts and truth.
I have noticed several people who have commented prominently regarding seeking of the truth of what happened on 9-11-01 are now putting forth various, but quite similar, theories about "what hit" the World Trade Center 2, the South Tower.
Richard D. Hall - the original proposer of the hologram hypothesis with new hypothesis
...http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D_4e07H_ha0&t=4s...
Dr. Morgan Reynolds - nomoregames.net
Dr. Judy Wood
Mr. Field McConnell - refutes "hologram theory" of John Lear
...http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tq3ct0KXVek...
(I hope someone facilitates this gentleman's taking of the Narcissistic Grandiosity Scale (NGS) psychological test.)
Mr. James Perloff
...http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cV1Y44NsfM8&t=5s...
Dr. Steven Macon Greer M.D.
"traumatologist" and ufologist and 9-11 "truth" commentator
Mr. John Lear
here are some recent YouTube titles wherein Mr. Lear speaks of his ideas.
John Lear, The Moon is a Soul Harvesting Station. A World Of Weird #13
Soul Cube on the Dark Side of the Moon? Archon Harvester Exclusive Content @ http://www.leakproject.com YouTube Channel ...
______________________________________
Some, but not all, of the common threads of these new 9-11 truth ideas are...
The object that "hit" WTC2
was actually a drone somehow made to appear as a plane.
A Boeing Drone, model E 10, was actually what was presented as United Airlines Flight 175, WTC2 "hit"
The drone had a large "pod" on its underbelly which was actually a missile.
The missile exploded upon impact with WTC2 and its mission was to provide distraction so that other elements of the destruction could ensue without detection.
The idea of the plane shaped gash in WTC1 North Tower is no longer thought to be a cartoon-like, Wiley Coyote, computer-generated imprint image. A drone of a specific type could in fact leave a real wing shaped destruction imprint in the side of the building.
And the beat goes on...
Views: 210
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Jeannon Kralj on
-
I do not rule for or rule out any of the information any of these commentators are now putting out, but I do think it is rather odd that they all seem to be coming out at the same time and seem to depart fromr normal critical analysis of 9-11 data and evidence.
Watch for buzz words, phrases and concepts of Dr. Greer in support of Dr. Judy Wood's Directed Energy Weapons theory of 9-11
https://www.brighteon.com/5823008248001
Dr. Steven Greer Interviewed by Mike Adams The Health Ranger - The Cosmic False Flag
and
...https://www.brighteon.com/5854551733001...
Health Ranger Mike Adams issues statement denouncing Jew haters and "Nazi" labelers (regarding Pittsburgh synagogue event)
Forget about Mike Adams' new BrightEon.com formerly Real.video site as a good alternative place to post videos other than YouTube.
-
-
Jeannon Kralj said:I do not rule for or rule out any of the information any of these commentators are now putting out, but I do think it is rather odd that they all seem to be coming out at the same time and seem to depart fromr normal critical analysis of 9-11 data and evidence.
Watch for buzz words, phrases and concepts of Dr. Greer in support of Dr. Judy Wood's Directed Energy Weapons theory of 9-11
https://www.brighteon.com/5823008248001
Dr. Steven Greer Interviewed by Mike Adams The Health Ranger - The Cosmic False Flag
and
...https://www.brighteon.com/5854551733001...
Health Ranger Mike Adams issues statement denouncing Jew haters and "Nazi" labelers (regarding Pittsburgh synagogue event)
I take that back about recommending BrightEon, Real.video, as being a good place to post videos other than YouTube. Mike Adams is Alex Jones v 2.0, only not as dramatic in acting form.
I just sent an email to Russ Winter of WinterWatch.net briefly summarizing my ideas about this new batch of 9-11 theories all having the same basic propositions, however, I choose not to post that here at this time. It looks like no one is looking at these new batch of theories in the aggregate in relation to continuing 9-11 research.
-
Permalink Reply by HenryMassingale on
-
The first video link did not share much about 9/11 other then a possible air speed at the time of impact, to the best of my memory the air speed was all ways disputed and some say it was not at 500 mph+ but at the norm of weight plus the normal air speed that pushed through the building.
About
Welcome to
9/11 Scholars Forum
© 2024 Created by James H. Fetzer.
Powered by
