9/11 Scholars Forum

Exposing Falsehoods and Revealing Truths

Dead Men Talking


Dead Men Talking

We collect the most relevant evidence of government participation in the events of 9/11. Bring evidence here and discuss its truth and relevance!

Website: http://www.deanhartwell.com
Members: 7
Latest Activity: Jun 14, 2010

Read Dead Men Talking

This is the book that presents my case about 9/11

I would like to hear your thoughts.

The point of the book is to identify the best evidence of government conspiracy. I mention the Standard Operating Procedures of air defense and how they were not followed; I mention "blips" appearing on the screens of FAA employees and who had the authority and the power to put them there to confuse them; I mention warnings given to Bush Administration officials that were not followed. And a lot more.

I avoided the more controversial evidence such as what happened at the Pentagon. I feared that my thoughts on this subject and others like it would distract from the proof beyond a reasonable doubt that government agents acted on 9/11 to commit murder. If you tell a skeptic several ideas, it is a cinch they will attack the ideas with the least factual support and ignore the rest of what you say.

If you have thoughts about what hit the WTC 1 and 2 and the Pentagon and about cell phones, etc. please tell me.

Discussion Forum

Future Petitions to Ask People to Support New Investigation on 9/11

This group will collect the most relevant facts on the culprits of 9/11 to make it easy to put together new petitions and fact sheets.  It will also serve as the basis for essays which are especially…Continue

Tags: article, essay, investigation, facts, petition

Started by Dean Apr 11, 2010.

Comment Wall


You need to be a member of Dead Men Talking to add comments!

Comment by Dean on May 16, 2010 at 1:34pm
We need someone representing the government to testify under oath about the footage released and to answer questions from the public. Without meaningful public input there won't be any resolution to any of these issues.
Comment by Whathappened Tothewtc on May 15, 2010 at 10:26pm
What if they released all the footage, and it showed exactly what it already shows, only in higher resolution. Then what? Is it time to dump TV Fakery after that?
Comment by Dean on May 15, 2010 at 3:47pm
Here is my draft petition:
(or use this link: http://deanhartwell.weebly.com/1/post/2010/05/help-wanted-find-proo...)


The FBI changed its list of 19 hijackers and has never acknowledged that at least seven of those named are still alive, even when factors like birth dates, home towns and residences were checked!

What do hijackers need?

Were there planes on 9/11?

There was more evidence of plane fakery than actual planes in New York
There have been no positive identifications of any uniquely identifiable component parts of planes alleged to have been hijacked that day.
Two of the planes allegedly used were not de-registered until 2002 and the others not until 2005.

What about the passengers?
None of the phone calls allegedly made from any of the four planes that day have been authenticated as having been made from the planes as we were told originally.

What about the airlines?
The airlines have still not been allowed to testify in court.


We demand to know the truth from the courts and our Congress. Please help us by signing this petition and by spreading this message around the Internet!
Comment by James H. Fetzer on May 15, 2010 at 7:22am
What about combining the absence of evidence of planes having crashed--the indications of video fakery in New York, the reporters on the scene reports of no evidence of planes having crashed at the Pentagon or at Shanksville, the failure of the government to produce even one uniquely identifiable component part out of millions from any of the planes that allegedly crashed, the discovery that the alleged phone calls from the planes--all of them--turn out to be fake, FAA records showing two of the planes were not deregistered until 2002 and the other two not until 2005, and the failure of the government to prove that the 19 alleged hijackers were aboard any of the planes--with concern about what in the world could have happened to the passengers, if those flights were actually phantom rather than real? And why has Judge Hellerstein reversed standard judicial procedure to deliberate on damages prior to taking testimony about liability for the few families who have not accepted money from the survivors' fund, which appears to have been calculated to keep the airlines from having to testify in court, where they might expose the entire charade? If there were no planes, then what has become of the passengers? or were they fabricated, too?
Comment by Dean on May 15, 2010 at 12:25am
Thanks, Jim and Sandy. I read and signed the petition. I like the petition but want to shorten it to focus first on one issue that we have the best chance of getting a response about.

What if we turned this into a question for the public like this one: Can anyone show us proof that any of the 270 passengers said to have gone on one of the 9/11 flights actually did so?
Comment by Georgia Brooks Mays on May 14, 2010 at 9:42pm
Sandy Rose... All true. The other question is what of the passenger's?? produce some of those people and WHAM-O non-believer's will have no choice but to revolt and demand the truth. I have posted before on that very topic. In other words, as we know there were no planes sooooo, that leaves 269 people (total number of passengers) unaccounted for. Folks that "saw" the supposed plane that their friend, husband, wife, ect.. were on "crash" into the buildings, at that moment wrote it off as just that. However, since their were no planes where are those folks? I believe those passengers did get on a plane .. it was landed and they were taken off, and killed. All those not protected by the government anyway ( Barbra Olsen for example.. I think I have that name right). That evidence, and concentration on the Pentagon, digging into that for answers.
Jim.. How can I help revive that? Now is the time with the new BS of so called bombs and the like IE.. times square, coolers ect.. Once again a set up by our government.. to advert the eyes for truth.
Comment by James H. Fetzer on May 14, 2010 at 3:07pm
Dean, Here is the original Scholar's petition. Just reading it reminds you of the lengths to which our own government has gone to conceal evidence from the American people. I would welcome a revival of this effort building on this one: http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/929981172?ltl=1141667399 Thanks.
Comment by sandy rose on May 14, 2010 at 1:57pm
course it wouldn't help a thing if they just handed over some
more fake stufff, but our video experts will see right thru that...:)
Comment by sandy rose on May 14, 2010 at 1:47pm
oh! thanks for asking, i believe Mr. Fetzer and the Others
still have it goin on over at Scholars for 9/11 Truth. Jim, if yer
listening please pipe up if that has changed, haint checked lately...

hey, you know, just very recently i was MOST pleasantly
surprised when the good old ACLU got in on releasing some info
that made me think they KNEW! oh crud, i can't even remember
what it was...........blocking it out maybe.....but i wrote back and
said to them how PSYCHED i was that they KNOW. (about 9/11)
someone like that would help us out greatly, maybe, if they could
be convinced that the entire fate of the Earth might depend on it.
i'm sure we could tie civil liberties in with it in more ways than 3000.

so anyway, what possible on Earth reason could our least
favorite war criminals have for NOT disclosing all footage from 9/11??
i mean, what lamo turdball excuse do they even USE for not wanting
to show that. proof of guilt ya ax me. (they probably cry about
nashnul skurity, or some bull, just their code word for "you don't wanna know.")
we would go many many miles with all footage disclosed, no
questions asked. hand it over, you lousy criminal psychopaths,...

and man, it sure would be nice to answer everyone's questions!
everyone would have to bow down to no planers for the next ten years.
guaranfreakin-t it. it's all we need. so simple, and yet.....so far.
specially when they have the whole gummint compromised on it.
and they probably only kept a few discreet copies to show their buds.

but ANYWAY, can we imagine if someone like THAT could help
us get those footages handed over? course, even as i say that, i
imagine they "lost" all of that stuff an age ago. but what would
their excuse be for that? whooops?

i guaran-freakin-t it, if 'we' could get any surviving footage videos
from any so called targets on 9/11 we could move forward and start
to climb out of this stankin swamp.

Mr. Jim, i like to keep the old Great Dean in mind about things...
Comment by Dean on May 14, 2010 at 12:11am
Hi Sandy,

Thanks! We would benefit greatly if we persuade the authorities to show the footage (public pressure could work). Where can I find the petition?


Members (6)


© 2022   Created by James H. Fetzer.   Powered by

Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service