Roger has a more benign concept of HAARP's military capabilities than does Leuren, whose mullti-part study appears as a blog on this forum. I can be found at this link: http://911scholars.ning.com/profiles/blogs/leuren-moret-on-911-and-the#comments I would invite those who have an interest in HAARP to evaluate the evidence for and against its potential as a weapon of destruction, including its capacity to induce effects such as earthquakes, which I certainly have believed to be the case. I would therefore be glad to have additional opinions from other members of the forum presented here. If Roger is right and some of us are laboring under false beliefs, we certainly want to know.
Moret does not do "studies" she makes stuff up - Moret has a BS in Geology and did some grad work in Geology in early 1980s. She has never done any scientific research since then. She is is very prolific on the internet and she likes to travel on other people's money. She does not like me because I have a bad habit of telling people who she really is. I have sent you a detailed discussion of HAARP (for the rest of you, go see www.haarp.alaska.edu and learn about this international research tool.) and about man made earthquakes. The largest of these was 4.3, 100 times smaller in magnitude than the 7.0 Haiti quake.
In case you are blocking my email response to you, here it is again:
The reason I like to have representatives of different disciplines is
because none of us know all there is to know about all of them. Why
not use your knowledge to educate the rest of us instead of launching
a vacuous ad hominem attack. If she's wrong, explain why? What's the
point of attacking me FOR POSTING A STUDY? I haven't made anything of
it, but you are acting like a loon by going after me for POSTING IT!
Surely you can do better! Did you join the forum only to attack me?