9/11 Scholars Forum

Exposing Falsehoods and Revealing Truths

Leuren Moret on 9/11 and the possible use of HAARP


COOPRADIO.ORG: HAARP & its role in the False Flag Operation of September 11, 2001 with Independent Scientist Leuren Moret - VII



COOPRADIO.ORG: HAARP & its role in the False Flag Operation of September 11, 2001 with Independent Scientist Leuren Moret






When: Dec. 15, 2008 @ Noon - 1 PM Pacific Time
Where: Vancouver COOP RADIO CFRO 102.7 FM www.coopradio.org
What: COOPRADIO.ORG: HAARP & its role in the False Flag Operation of September 11, 2001 with Independent Scientist Leuren Moret

BIO: http://exopolitics.blogs.com/peaceinspace/2009/12/leuren-moret-biog...

Host: Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd

Part VII in the HAARP Series.

LISTEN TO AUDIO ARCHIVE NOW (MP3):

INTERVIEW MP3:
http://exopolitics.blogs.com/files/coop-haarpand9_11-leurenmoret_32...

HAARP & its role in the False Flag Operation of September 11, 2001

THIS INTERVIEW ADDRESSES THE “ENERGY BUDGET” AS THE CONSTRAINTS AND METHOD FOR ANALYSIS OF THE SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL EVIDENCE FOR THE USE OF
HAARP AND BEAM WEAPONS AT THE WORLD TRADE CENTER SITE ON 9/11

ENERGY BUDGET:
IN TERMS OF THE SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE FOR HAARP/BEAM WEAPONS USED AT THE
WTC, THE ENERGY BUDGET IS THE MOST CRITICAL FACTOR TO USE AS AN
APPROACH FOR SOLVING THE MYSTERY OF THE WTC DESTRUCTION. THE ENERGY
REQUIRED TO TAKE DOWN THE BUILDINGS, AND TO CREATE THE VERY SMALL SIZE
OF THE PARTICLES OF THE DUST, MUST BE ACCOUNTED FOR. CHEMICAL
EXPLOSIVES DO NOT PROVIDE THE ENERGY NEEDED TO PRODUCE THE LARGE VOLUME
OF VERY SMALL NANOSIZED PARTICLES PRODUCED FROM THE COLLAPSE OF THE WTC
BUILDINGS. YOU CAN’T GET MORE ENERGY OUT OF IT THAN YOU PUT INTO IT.

EVIDENCE:

- Seismic Record: the energy budget recorded in the seismic record on
the day of 9/11 and the collapse of the buildings did not reflect the
mass of building materials involved in the collapse, nor the nearly
freefall of the collapsing buildings. The seismic record demonstrates
an event on the scale of a quarry blast. WHERE WAS THE THUD?

- Kinetic Energy: two robust buildings with very robust steel beam
reinforcement would release a sizeable amount of kinetic energy from
the buildings falling – that would be all of the energy that went into
the construction of the buildings. The release of that amount of
kinetic energy is not reflected in the physical evidence on the seismic
record. Into what physical process did that kinetic energy go?

- Molecular Dissociation: the collapse of the buildings produced the
highest mass per volume of very fine particles (nanoparticles) ever
measured in an air sample in the United States. It takes a tremendous
amount of energy to dissociate or break the molecular bonds of steel,
concrete and other building materials that were “powdered” into very
fine particles during the collapse of the buildings. The largest mass
per volume of METALS ever measured in an air sample in the US were
reported by Dr. Thomas Cahill who did air monitoring for 5 months.
Metal is used in buildings because it is very strong – and would
require large amounts of energy to reduce it to nanoparticles. Chemical
explosives do not release enough energy to produce that volume of very
fine particles. A much more energetic process was involved such as
laser or beam energy which releases focused and concentrated energy as
complex waveforms necessary to cause molecular dissociation.

- Physical Evidence of Buildings Collapsing: in videos of the collapses
on 9/11 the WTC buildings erupted into emulsion like a drinking
fountain, and the rubble did not hit the ground. Even on tape huge
pieces of aluminum building siding vaporized as they were freefalling,
and never hit the ground.
o Controlled Demolition: this was not a controlled demolition
♣ Detritus Pile: should be 1/3 the height of the building
The 100+ story buildings were about 1 story high when the collapse of the
buildings ended. A fireman on one of the news videos said the antenna
that had been on the of B. 1 was on the top of a pile of rubble about
one story high. The rubble pile should have been 35 stories if it was a
conventional controlled demolition.
♣ Rubble Never Hit the Ground – this defies gravity, where did the rubble go?
♣ Footprints - Geometrically Round Holes: contiguous round holes 24’ in
diameter were in the footprints of the WTC buildings 1 and 2, and a 60’
deep geometrically round hole was in the middle of Liberty Street near
the WTC. This is evidence of beam weapons. There was NO debris inside
the footprints of the two WTC buildings… only bare dirt with circles in
the dirt.
♣ Livermore Nuclear Weapons Lab Beam Weapon Demo: in 1955 the microwave oven was invented and was a concept for a beam
weapon.
In the summer of 1990, I observed a demonstration of the Livermore Shiva laser facility in the middle of the night. A 16’
diameter amber colored beam was shot straight up into the sky from the
lab and all air traffic was diverted for a 5 mile radius during the
demonstration. When I asked a grad student working at the laser
facility what they were trying to do, he said “Make a star”. I knew
that could not be true because lasers are used to molecularly
dissociate materials by releasing tremendous amounts of energy as very
advanced and complex waveforms. Livermore had long been involved in
development of HAARP since 1978 in secret collaboration with the Soviet
Union, AND advanced beam weapons.
o Dust: in videos of the collapse larger particles fell and cascaded
down from the buildings under the forces of gravity, but before they hit the
ground they vaporized and suddenly went up into the atmosphere like an
antigravity demonstration. Nanoparticles are so tiny that they are not

subject to the forces of gravity, so molecular dissociation
occurred on the larger particles as they were freefalling,
reducing them into nano-particles (0.1 microns in diamater and smaller) which
suddenly obeyed other physical laws – quantum mechanics. More evidence
of HAARP/beam weapon technology applied during collapse.
o Satellite photos: showed dust going into upper atmosphere –
which had to be nanoparticles and may have been enhanced
by other technology because most very fine particles/dust would stay in
the Troposphere and be rained out in 2 months as we know from depleted
uranium particulate releases from battlefield already.
o 1400 Toasted Cars: located blocks from the WTC buildings,
with door handles missing, engine blocks missing, blistering on some parts
of the car finish, strange rust patterns on the bodies of the cars.
o Paper Around Cars Not Burned: whatever “vaporized” the
engine blocks and the door handles on 1400 cars did not ignite fragile and
flammable paper lying all over the ground around the cars. If engine
blocks and door handles selectively vaporized, why didn’t body of car
vaporize?
o Pile of Cars Spontaneously Combusted: in a news video, the
entire pile of cars started burning spontaneously at the same time with no
visible cause, it was not a fire that started in one car and spread to
others.
o Rust Occurred Immediately: on cars and trucks, and in FEMA
photos there was heavy rust on STEEL beams – steel does not rust, and it is a
slow oxidation process that results in rusting of iron. This rusting
happened immediately.
o Basements Of WTC Buildings Undamaged: stuffed
mannequins in the basement with clothing on were carried out of the basement
undamaged. If a 100+-story building collapsed into its basement and
left a 35-story rubble pile, there would be nothing left in the
basement. Even streetcars underground at the WTC were pulled out after
the collapse and had no damage.
o Prof. Cahill Air Monitoring Samples: the hardest and most
durable materials vaporized (steel, concrete etc), and the most fragile
materials (paper) cascading out of windows and all over the ground for
blocks were undamaged
o Truckloads of Potting Soil: right after the WTC disaster, the
ground was “fuming”, and sequential FEMA aerial photos show 130 dumptrucks
FULL of soil (filled almost to the top of the dumptruck space) covered
with tarps so that the dirt in the trucks was not visible to onlookers
on the street, coming INTO the WTC area, dumping the soil and going out
for more. This happened even before the rescues or cleanup started and
it continued for some time. The piles of soil were left for a week and
got higher each day in sequential photos. The soil “fuming” lasted
until March 2002 (8 months).
o Where Were All the WTC Bodies?: Emergency Room MDs Dr.
Tony Daher and Dr. Lincoln Cleaver were interviewed on TV on 9/11 about the
casualties. They said there weren’t any after about noon on 9/11, no
more casualties came to the ER. Firemen saw NO BODIES but talked about
the antenna on top of building 1 that was at ground level on top of
about one story of rubble.
o Boots Disintegrated: on emergency responders after 2 hours.
They had to get new boots every 2 hours – molecular dissociation. It was not from burning, their skin would have been damaged.
o NO FIRES IN BUILDINGS: William Rodriguez, Senior
Janitor at WTC said there were no fires in the buildings. He
conducted rescue efforts, saved injured workers and had
keys to every lock in both buildings.
o No Ground Fuming During Rain: For 99 days the “burning”
(fuming) continued at the WTC site, but when it rained there was no fuming. If
it had been fires burning, the rain would have caused steam from
heating rainwater.
o USGS: Iron versus Steel: the USGS analyzed the mineral form
of the rust on steel beams and iron objects at the WTC. They did not
address the “steel does not rust” issue, but dodged it by referring to
the rusted steel beams in the rubble pile as “iron beams” and gave
mineral analyses of IRON minerals produced by oxidation.
o Official Sample Data Not Reliable: spectral absorption images
at the WTC indicated average particle size was about 1 micron, which is
subjected to gravity and would have fallen with the collapsed
buildings. USGS did not collect many dust samples and collecting
samples by other different agencies did not agree with each other. No
samples were taken at the toasted cars.
o Beam Weapon Evidence: was present at the top of the WTC
buildings as ‘lathering up’ started before buildings started
coming down. ‘Lathering up’ in videos preceded the collapse of all buildings,
even Building 7 which supposedly Larry Silverstein when he said “Pull
it” to firefighters meant controlled demolition. Color alteration and
modification in news videos compared to other photos/videos at tops of
buildings indicates “doctoring” of images.
When the Seattle Dome was destroyed with controlled demolition, the dust created by the
destruction did not get any higher than the top of the building. The
WTC dust got into the upper atmosphere almost immediately – which
indicates VERY TINY atmospheric dust sized particles (0.1 micron and
smaller), in fact smaller than atmospheric dust which stays mainly in
the Troposphere.
o “Lathering Up” Incriminating: Building 7 “lathered up” even
before B. 2 went down. B7 not damaged at all by B. 2 going down – right next to each other.
o Freon tanks very odd, large tanks removed from WTC
building and OSHA made bogus statement about what and why they were removed. Was
freon used in takedown? A NYC cop I met with Cindy Sheehan said he was
injured in B. 7 and removed on a gurney, but his eyes were covered so
he could not see anything as they left the building. He reported he
was able to see dead bodies lying all over the floor as he was being
carried out – BEFORE building 7 had collapsed. Was this due to Freon
asphyxiation put through ventilation system like in recent Russian
submarine disaster?
o Minneapolis Bridge Collapse: similarities to WTC disaster,
every bridge segment failed at exactly the same time instead of domino effect
after first collapse. This defies the laws of engineering. It should
have been one place failed and sequential domino-like failures followed
for a normal engineering collapse.

911 Blog Forum Comment: We stand at the beginning of a new age. Our government has in its hands a
method of disrupting the molecular basis for matter [HAARP/beam
weapons], and its first impulse was to weaponize it. Is this so hard to
understand? Like splitting atoms to create destruction was it hard to
understand in 1945? [HAARP - the new and improved model]

Of course this new “invention” came when the United States ruled supreme.
A weapon system of vast new power comes in time and we don’t have an
enemy worthy of it, so naturally we use it on ourselves, ‘Wag the Dog’.

NOTE: The copyright on this radio program is held by Vancouver Coop Radio CFRO 102.7 FM, which is a non-profit organization. http://www.coopradio.org

The views expressed on the radio program are entirely those of the guest, independent scientist Leuren Moret. Email: leurenmoret@yahoo.com

Other Coop Radio guests who have conducted similar interviews in this area include Dr. Judy Wood and John Hutchinson. See: http://www.drjudywood.com

COOPRADIO.ORG: Dr. Judy Wood & Canadian Inventor/Scientist John Hutchison on 9/11 & The Hutchison Effect

http://exopolitics.blogs.com/exopolitics_radio/2008/04/coopradioorg--1.html

Listeners should contact Leuren Moret, Dr. Judy Wood and John Hutchinson directly with regard to any questions as to content, conclusions and overlap.

Thank you.

COOPRADIO: HAARP Series of Radio Programs with Independent Scientist Leuren Moret


HAARP as a Space-Based Weapon of Mass Destruction

Part I: Monday June 2, 2008 @ Noon-1 PM PDT
WHERE: Vancouver Coop Radio CFRO 102.7 FM
LISTEN LIVE: http://www.coopradio.org
Host: Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd

LISTEN TO PART I : Leuren Moret: HAARP - as a space-based weapon of mass destruction - and Environmental War, SYNOPSIS of talk and listen:
http://peaceinspace.blogs.com/peaceinspaceorg/2008/05/coopradioorg-...

LISTEN TO MP3 OF PART I:
http://exopolitics.blogs.com/exopolitics_radio/files/COOPRADIO-HAAR...
------------------------------

-------------------------------------------
PART II: Monday June 23, 2008 @ Noon-1 PM PDT
Leuren Moret: HAARP and Environmental War, SYNOPSIS AND REFS.
http://peaceinspace.blogs.com/peaceinspaceorg/2008/06/coopradioorg-...

LISTEN to MP3 Part II:
http://exopolitics.blogs.com/exopolitics_radio/files/II-COOPRADIO-M...

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Part III: Monday July 14, 2008 @ Noon - 1 PM PDT
Leuren Moret: HAARP & Weather Modification/Weather Warfare
SYNOPSIS AND REFERENCES:
http://peaceinspace.blogs.com/peaceinspaceorg/2008/07/coopradioorg-...

LISTEN to MP3 Part III:
http://exopolitics.blogs.com/exopolitics_radio/files/COOPRADIO-HAAR...

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Part IV: August 4, 2008 @ Noon - 1 PM PDT
Leuren Moret: HAARP and Weather Modification (CONTINUED)
http://peaceinspace.blogs.com/peaceinspaceorg/2008/08/coopradioorg-...
SYNOPSIS AND REFERENCES:

LISTEN to MP3 Part IV:
http://exopolitics.blogs.com/exopolitics_radio/files/moret_part_iv_...

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Part V: Monday Sept 15, 2008
Leuren Moret: HAARP: Arctic Ice Cap Melt Down, Controlled Ecocide, and Depopulation
SYNOPSIS AND REFERENCES:
http://peaceinspace.blogs.com/peaceinspaceorg/2008/09/coopradioorg-...


LISTEN to MP3 Part V:
http://peaceinspace.blogs.com/peaceinspaceorg/files/haarp_part_v_mo...

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Part VI: Nov. 3, 2008 @ Noon - 1 PM Pacific Time
Leuren Moret: HAARP & Mind Control in the 2008 Canada & USA Elections
SYNOPSIS AND REFERENCES:
http://peaceinspace.blogs.com/peaceinspaceorg/2008/10/coopradioorg-...

LISTEN to MP3 Part VI:
http://exopolitics.blogs.com/exopolitics_radio/files/COOP-MORET-MIN...

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Part VII: December 15, 2008 (but mp3 is posted below)
Leuren Moret: HAARP & its role in the False Flag Operation of September 11, 2001

SYNOPSIS AND REFERENCES:
http://peaceinspace.blogs.com/peaceinspaceorg/2008/12/my-entry.html

LISTEN to MP3 Part VII:
http://exopolitics.blogs.com/files/coop-haarpand9_11-leurenmoret_32...

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Part ? : July 23, 2007
Leuren Moret: HAARP and Mind Control
(Link to be posted soon with Synopsis, Transcript and references)

LISTEN to MP3 Part ?:
http://exopolitics.blogs.com/exopolitics_radio/files/coopleurenmind...

Views: 693

Comment

You need to be a member of 9/11 Scholars Forum to add comments!

Join 9/11 Scholars Forum

Comment by James H. Fetzer on November 12, 2010 at 9:22am
Roger has a more benign concept of HAARP's military capabilities than does Leuren, whose mullti-part study appears as a blog on this forum. I can be found at this link: http://911scholars.ning.com/profiles/blogs/leuren-moret-on-911-and-... I would invite those who have an interest in HAARP to evaluate the evidence for and against its potential as a weapon of destruction, including its capacity to induce effects such as earthquakes, which I certainly have believed to be the case. I would therefore be glad to have additional opinions from other members of the forum presented here. If Roger is right and some of us are laboring under false beliefs, we certainly want to know.
Comment by Shallel Octavia on November 4, 2010 at 10:21am
Thank you Dr. Judy Wood-Moret!
Comment by James H. Fetzer on November 4, 2010 at 7:16am

© 2019   Created by James H. Fetzer.   Powered by

Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service