How is everything with you, I picked interest on you after going through your short profile and deemed it necessary to write you immediately. I have something very vital to disclose to you,but I found it difficult to express myself here, since it's a public site.Could you please get back to me on ( email@example.com ) for the full details.Have a nice day Thanks God bless.
Dr Reynolds: Welcome. Thanks for joining the group. The problem with Dr Wood's DEW / Hutchinson effect idea is lack of evidence and failure to communicate. The big thing with the nuke vs DEW question is the discovery of radionuclides around Ground
Zero by various researchers from UC Davis and Columbia I think ... as well as William Tahil. Please look at Dwain Deets' idea of how to get at the methods used at: ... http://vimeo/29575849 . Mr Deets will be speaking with Chuck and Dr Fetzer at the
Montreal meeting in June. I'll be looking forward to hearing anything you have to add to
The bad news is, the extent to which Judy Wood says a DEW caused the destruction of towers, she is wrong. The heavy explosives were nukes. I wish she would come here to debate a few specific points about the details, in a friendly way. I myself am not confrontational, I just like to debate a point or two .
if you listen to my interviews with Jim Fetzer you will see that I have promoted that Dr. Judy Wood has presented the best and most comprehensive evidence of any researcher, which covers about 80-90% of her book, but her interpretation of her evidence via DEWs and The Hutchison Field Effects is what I cannot agree with, when I have shown that nanoThermate & High Explosives with Shape Charges involved and possibly mini nukes can explain all of her 43 points that she points out that need to get an adequate explanation. I will not go into detail here but you can see my explanations in the Power Point Pics/Posters on this site and can listen to my shows with Jim from the archives of the Real Deal to pick up on all of the details, although that will involve an investment of time to listen to them and to absorb the simple science & math involved.
You checked out Judy's work which involved a sizable investment of time. I hope you will, eventually, check out my work here on this site so that you might get some insights into where I am coming from, and possibly learn some imaginative and creative science along the way.
I look forward to presenting my research PP Posters in June in Montreal and believe that the attendees will receive my work quite well as most of them may not be familiar with my work as you may not be familiar with it yet.
Please check it out sometime which should be enjoyable for you and anyone interested in an alternate hard core scientific analytical view
We all look forward to your contributions, even if we may not agree with each on some issues, specifically the DEW theory of Dr. Judy Wood.
I hope you get a chance to review my most extensive research in terms of Power Point Posters & Photos and to the videos I have posted, mostly from YouTube.
Jim Fetzer has asked me to present my research on the Twin Towers Impossible Collapses this June in Montreal, and I am now preparing for that presentation which will include many or some of the posters I have posted to this site in the photos section, especially the Physics, Chemistry, Engineering, & Math quantitative aspects associated with the impossible collapses, especially concerning the required Forces & Energies for bring down a Twin Tower.
I have enjoyed your interviews by Jim Fetzer on his Real Deal show and look forward to hearing more from you on Jim's shows in the future...
I have done about 15 or so hours of debunking Dr. Judy Wood's DEW Theory with the Hutchison Effects on Jim's show that you may wish to listen to sometime.
I consider my original research work to be most convincing as do many other people concerning nano Thermate/Thermite and Explosives, maybe even nuclear mini bombs.